Added Intel HNS2600TPR Blade #1178
Conversation
|
So for the PCIe slots, can they be used for NIC cards? If so, then yes they are 100% valid as module-bays That being said, NetBox does not yet support storage management, but it is on the roadmap. |
danner26
added
the
status: revisions needed
|
Hello, unfortunately today we had to make a change to the schema in which weight is defined by. The upstream NetBox API requires weight to be passed to it in the following format: Due to this change, I have updated your branch against the current master. This might require you to update your PR, if you had weight currently defined, so that your PR is in-line with the new weight schema. If you have any issues, please let me know or refer to this PR for more information. |
|
Does this PR need anything else? |
No, i think i added everything that is attached to the chassis and it is ready to be merged 👍 |
danner26
added
status: accepted
and removed
status: revisions needed
* pre-commit fixed eof new line * fixed child weight, added module-bays for pcie riser and added QSFP+ interface * fixed weight and module-bays positions --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel W. Anner <[email protected]>
2 participants
I created the .yaml file for the Intel blade with the Specs from the Intel Spec sheet. I thought about adding the PCIe slots as module bays but i was not sure if this is the intended way to model this kind of data inside NetBox. Please let me know how i can improve my contributions.