Skip to content

Conversation

@robsdedude
Copy link
Member

Amends #784
There were other mentions/usages of Session.read/write_transaction that needed
replacing with Session.execute_read/write.

While there was a test to make sure the example in the README works, there was
no assertion the test actually tests what's in the README. Added a test to
assert the former test resembles the README example.

Amends neo4j#784
There were other mentions/usages of `Session.read/write_transaction` that needed
replacing with `Session.execute_read/write`.

While there was a test to make sure the example in the README works, there was
no assertion the test actually tests what's in the README. Added a test to
assert the former test resembles the README example.
Copy link
Contributor

@AndyHeap-NeoTech AndyHeap-NeoTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All makes sense.

@robsdedude robsdedude merged commit b273101 into neo4j:5.0 Aug 31, 2022
@robsdedude robsdedude deleted the fix-renaming-to-execute branch August 31, 2022 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants