Skip to content

Conversation

@AlaDeli7
Copy link

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145
Copy link
Collaborator

4t145 commented May 30, 2025

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@AlaDeli7
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants