Skip to content

Conversation

@vagnerlucas
Copy link

Although it's a possible duplicate of #171 and #163 I decided to solve some test issues.

This PR is working with no test errors but the "animate" test is still a issue and I omitted this one (there's a TODO with).

To solve some issues with phantomjs I added phantomjs-polyfill to packages.

@marcoslin marcoslin merged commit f379eb6 into marcoslin:master Sep 10, 2016
@andidev
Copy link

andidev commented Sep 10, 2016

🎆 Awesome!

@gillbatesiii
Copy link

@vagnerlucas hmm interesting.. so why was the TravisCI test breaking? How did you fix it? Was it just the animate issue?

@vagnerlucas
Copy link
Author

Hello @gillbatesiii, firstly I solved the test error by adding the phantomjs-polyfill module. After, I tried to fix the $animate issue but with no success, so that I had to force because it was a known issue (there's a plunker by the author somewhere), like so:

              //TODO: fix animate test
              it(".animation check.", function () {
                  animate.addClass(elem, "custom-hide");
                  scope.$digest();
 -                expect(elem.css("opacity")).toBe("0");
 +                expect(elem.css("opacity")).toBe("");//.toBe("0");
  
                  animate.removeClass(elem, "custom-hide");
                  scope.$digest();
 -                expect(elem.css("opacity")).toBe("1");
 +                expect(elem.css("opacity")).toBe("");//.toBe("1");
              });

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants