Skip to content

Conversation

@sreichel
Copy link
Contributor

@sreichel sreichel commented Nov 22, 2018

Description (*)

See comment at #19309

@sreichel please consider removal of logic related to columnCountLayoutDepend also. Was never used in M2 but never removed as well.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. n/a

Manual testing scenarios (*)

  1. n/a

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sreichel. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento-engcom-team give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation

@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

Hi @sreichel , thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately removing public/protected functions and properties are backward incompatible changes and cannot be accepted. For now it would be good to mark the functions you think should be removed as deprecated.

I would also get an architecural approval for such changes by creating a pull request with proposition here: https://github.com/magento/architecture

Copy link
Contributor

@orlangur orlangur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sreichel nice!

Please remove testLayoutDependColumnCount completely as it does not make a lot of sense now and we are good to go.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added this to the Release: 2.3.1 milestone Nov 24, 2018
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @orlangur, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-3551 has been created to process this Pull Request

Copy link
Member

@sivaschenko sivaschenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sreichel the changes introduced in this pull request are backward incompatible, if you'd like to remove _columnCountLayoutDepend - please mark it deprecated but do not eliminate any usages/functionality yet.

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

@sivaschenko your statement is incorrect. This is Magento 1 reminant and never did anything useful in Magento 2.0 GA or later.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @orlangur, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-3551 has been created to process this Pull Request

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

@sivaschenko @sidolov please clarify if anything left to be done here taking into consideration #19349 (comment).

@ghost ghost assigned sidolov Mar 14, 2019
*
* @var array
*/
protected $_columnCountLayoutDepend = [];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, mark property as deprecated due to backward compatibility instead of remove.

Copy link
Contributor

@orlangur orlangur Mar 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Stas, somehow I overlooked it, while "do not eliminate any usages/functionality yet" looks completely not correct to me.

@sreichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sidolov @slitvyachenko @orlangur Please close. Not wasting my time here anymore .... "please consider removal of logic related to columnCountLayoutDepend also. Was never used in M2 but never removed as well."

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2019

Hi @sreichel, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants