Skip to content

Conversation

xpoback
Copy link
Contributor

@xpoback xpoback commented Jun 17, 2018

Description

Fixes TypeError for void() method in Directpost payment method of Authorizenet module.

The method expects an argument of DataObject type but instead none is given. Passing the response object fixes the problem.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Argument 1 passed to Magento\Sales\Model\Order\Payment must be an instance of Magento\Framework\DataObject, none given #16184: Argument 1 passed to Magento\Sales\Model\Order\Payment must be an instance of Magento\Framework\DataObject, none given

Manual testing scenarios

  1. Setup authorizenet
  2. Setup a plugin that uses declineOrder method of the Directpost model
  3. Checkout with authorizenet

Contribution checklist

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)

@magento-cicd2
Copy link
Contributor

magento-cicd2 commented Jun 17, 2018

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @xpoback. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento-engcom-team give me test instance - deploy test instance based on Pull Request changes
  • @magento-engcom-team give me new test instance - deploy NEW test instance based on Pull Request changes
  • @magento-engcom-team give me {$VERSION} instance - deploy Vanilla Magento instance for Issue or Pull Request

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @orlangur, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-2021 has been created to process this Pull Request

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @xpoback. Thank you for your contribution.
Changes from your Pull Request will be available with the upcoming 2.2.6 release.

Please, consider to port this solution to 2.3 release line.
You may use Porting tool to port commits automatically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants