Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@bdenham
Copy link
Contributor

@bdenham bdenham commented Feb 17, 2021

Purpose of this pull request

This pull request (PR) reworks the "Extending content types" section of the PB docs, while also reorganizing/renaming a few topics and directories.

Checks and fixes for links have been made.

Affected DevDocs pages

Many Page Builder topics.

whatsnew
New Page Builder topics on how to extend content types. Learn how to add new features, styles, and behaviors to existing content types in these topics:

@bdenham bdenham added Major Update Significant original updates to existing content Internal Dev Differentiates work between community and Magento staff 2.4.x Magento 2.4.x related changes 2.4.2 labels Feb 17, 2021
@bdenham bdenham self-assigned this Feb 17, 2021
@bdenham bdenham requested a review from keharper February 17, 2021 22:00
@bdenham
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdenham commented Feb 17, 2021

running tests

@bdenham bdenham merged commit 4fd4ee1 into master Feb 17, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 17, 2021

Hi @bdenham, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

@bdenham bdenham deleted the pb-updates branch February 17, 2021 22:59
@bdenham bdenham changed the title PB docs update with better directory naming and organization Page Builder docs update on extending content types Feb 24, 2021
@bdenham bdenham changed the title Page Builder docs update on extending content types New Page Builder docs on extending content types Feb 24, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

2.4.x Magento 2.4.x related changes 2.4.2 Internal Dev Differentiates work between community and Magento staff Major Update Significant original updates to existing content Progress: done

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants