-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
[mlir][NFC] update mlir/Dialect
create APIs (30/n)
#150643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mlir][NFC] update mlir/Dialect
create APIs (30/n)
#150643
Conversation
See llvm#147168 for more info.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-openacc @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-scf Author: Maksim Levental (makslevental) ChangesSee #147168 for more info. Patch is 47.25 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150643.diff 10 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
index f82ece0db9331..020c0fe770bfc 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ class RootOrderingTest : public ::testing::Test {
builder.setInsertionPointToStart(&block);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
// Ops will be deleted when `block` is destroyed.
- v[i] = builder.create<ConstantIntOp>(builder.getUnknownLoc(), i, 32);
+ v[i] = ConstantIntOp::create(builder, builder.getUnknownLoc(), i, 32);
}
/// Checks that optimal branching on graph has the given cost and
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
index 836efdb307f97..6ac9a873e6154 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class OpenACCOpsTest : public ::testing::Test {
template <typename Op>
void testAsyncOnly(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly(d));
@@ -82,12 +82,12 @@ void testAsyncOnlyDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, asyncOnlyTestDataEntry) {
template <typename Op>
void testAsyncValue(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(), empty);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void testAsyncValue(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setAsyncOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getAsyncOperandsMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -158,12 +158,12 @@ void testAsyncValueDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(), empty);
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void testAsyncValueDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setAsyncOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getAsyncOperandsMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -197,13 +197,13 @@ template <typename Op>
void testNumGangsValues(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_EQ(op->getNumGangsValues().begin(), op->getNumGangsValues().end());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val1 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val2 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 4);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 4);
auto dtypeNone = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::None);
op->getNumGangsMutable().assign(val1->getResult());
op->setNumGangsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNone}));
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, numGangsValuesTest) {
template <typename Op>
void testVectorLength(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVectorLengthValue(), empty);
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void testVectorLength(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVectorLengthValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setVectorLengthDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getVectorLengthMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ template <typename Op>
void testWaitOnly(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWaitOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWaitOnly(d));
@@ -332,15 +332,15 @@ template <typename Op>
void testWaitValues(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_EQ(op->getWaitValues().begin(), op->getWaitValues().end());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val1 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val2 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 4);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 4);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val3 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 5);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 5);
auto dtypeNone = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::None);
op->getWaitOperandsMutable().assign(val1->getResult());
op->setWaitOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNone}));
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, waitValuesTest) {
}
TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, loopOpGangVectorWorkerTest) {
- OwningOpRef<LoopOp> op = b.create<LoopOp>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<LoopOp> op = LoopOp::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasGang());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasVector());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWorker());
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, loopOpGangVectorWorkerTest) {
TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, routineOpTest) {
OwningOpRef<RoutineOp> op =
- b.create<RoutineOp>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ RoutineOp::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasSeq());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasVector());
@@ -564,12 +564,12 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), varPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getType(), memrefTy);
@@ -579,24 +579,24 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->getVarPtrPtr());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -637,17 +637,17 @@ void testShortDataExitOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = b.create<GetDevicePtrOp>(
- loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = GetDevicePtrOp::create(
+ b, loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> accPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(accPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), varPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAccPtr(), accPtr);
@@ -656,24 +656,24 @@ void testShortDataExitOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getStructured());
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -689,17 +689,17 @@ void testShortDataExitNoVarPtrOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = b.create<GetDevicePtrOp>(
- loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = GetDevicePtrOp::create(
+ b, loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> accPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(accPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAccPtr(), accPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getDataClause(), dataClause);
@@ -707,24 +707,24 @@ void testShortDataExitNoVarPtrOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getStructured());
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -742,16 +742,16 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuildersMappableVar(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
auto int64Ty = b.getI64Type();
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, int64Ty);
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
SmallVector<Value> indices;
OwningOpRef<memref::LoadOp> loadVarOp =
- b.create<memref::LoadOp>(loc, int64Ty, varPtrOp->getResult(), indices);
+ memref::LoadOp::create(b, loc, int64Ty, varPtrOp->getResult(), indices);
EXPECT_TRUE(isMappableType(loadVarOp->getResult().getType()));
TypedValue<MappableType> var =
cast<TypedValue<MappableType>>(loadVarOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, var,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, var,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVar(), var);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), nullptr);
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
index fecd960d694b1..ef2312398265f 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
@@ -119,45 +119,45 @@ class SCFLoopLikeTest : public ::testing::Test {
TEST_F(SCFLoopLikeTest, queryUnidimensionalLooplikes) {
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> lb =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 0);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> ub =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 10);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 10);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> step =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 2);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 2);
OwningOpRef<scf::ForOp> forOp =
- b.create<scf::ForOp>(loc, lb.get(), ub.get(), step.get());
+ scf::ForOp::create(b, loc, lb.get(), ub.get(), step.get());
checkUnidimensional(forOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = b.create<scf::ForallOp>(
- loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(lb->getResult()),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = scf::ForallOp::create(
+ b, loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(lb->getResult()),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(ub->getResult()),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(step->getResult()), ValueRange(), std::nullopt);
checkUnidimensional(forallOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = b.create<scf::ParallelOp>(
- loc, ValueRange(lb->getResult()), ValueRange(ub->getResult()),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = scf::ParallelOp::create(
+ b, loc, ValueRange(lb->getResult()), ValueRange(ub->getResult()),
ValueRange(step->getResult()), ValueRange());
checkUnidimensional(parallelOp.get());
}
TEST_F(SCFLoopLikeTest, queryMultidimensionalLooplikes) {
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> lb =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 0);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> ub =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 10);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 10);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> step =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 2);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 2);
- OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = b.create<scf::ForallOp>(
- loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = scf::ForallOp::create(
+ b, loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({ub->getResult(), ub->getResult()}),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({step->getResult(), step->getResult()}),
ValueRange(), std::nullopt);
checkMultidimensional(forallOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = b.create<scf::ParallelOp>(
- loc, ValueRange({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = scf:...
[truncated]
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: Maksim Levental (makslevental) ChangesSee #147168 for more info. Patch is 47.25 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150643.diff 10 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
index f82ece0db9331..020c0fe770bfc 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Conversion/PDLToPDLInterp/RootOrderingTest.cpp
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ class RootOrderingTest : public ::testing::Test {
builder.setInsertionPointToStart(&block);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
// Ops will be deleted when `block` is destroyed.
- v[i] = builder.create<ConstantIntOp>(builder.getUnknownLoc(), i, 32);
+ v[i] = ConstantIntOp::create(builder, builder.getUnknownLoc(), i, 32);
}
/// Checks that optimal branching on graph has the given cost and
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
index 836efdb307f97..6ac9a873e6154 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCOpsTest.cpp
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class OpenACCOpsTest : public ::testing::Test {
template <typename Op>
void testAsyncOnly(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly(d));
@@ -82,12 +82,12 @@ void testAsyncOnlyDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasAsyncOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, asyncOnlyTestDataEntry) {
template <typename Op>
void testAsyncValue(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(), empty);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void testAsyncValue(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setAsyncOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getAsyncOperandsMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -158,12 +158,12 @@ void testAsyncValueDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(), empty);
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void testAsyncValueDataEntry(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAsyncValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setAsyncOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getAsyncOperandsMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -197,13 +197,13 @@ template <typename Op>
void testNumGangsValues(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_EQ(op->getNumGangsValues().begin(), op->getNumGangsValues().end());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val1 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val2 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 4);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 4);
auto dtypeNone = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::None);
op->getNumGangsMutable().assign(val1->getResult());
op->setNumGangsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNone}));
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, numGangsValuesTest) {
template <typename Op>
void testVectorLength(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
mlir::Value empty;
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVectorLengthValue(), empty);
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void testVectorLength(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVectorLengthValue(d), empty);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
auto dtypeNvidia = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::Nvidia);
op->setVectorLengthDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNvidia}));
op->getVectorLengthMutable().assign(val->getResult());
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ template <typename Op>
void testWaitOnly(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWaitOnly());
for (auto d : dtypes)
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWaitOnly(d));
@@ -332,15 +332,15 @@ template <typename Op>
void testWaitValues(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context, Location loc,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypes,
llvm::SmallVector<DeviceType> &dtypesWithoutNone) {
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_EQ(op->getWaitValues().begin(), op->getWaitValues().end());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val1 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val2 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 4);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 4);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> val3 =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 5);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 5);
auto dtypeNone = DeviceTypeAttr::get(&context, DeviceType::None);
op->getWaitOperandsMutable().assign(val1->getResult());
op->setWaitOperandsDeviceTypeAttr(b.getArrayAttr({dtypeNone}));
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, waitValuesTest) {
}
TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, loopOpGangVectorWorkerTest) {
- OwningOpRef<LoopOp> op = b.create<LoopOp>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ OwningOpRef<LoopOp> op = LoopOp::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasGang());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasVector());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasWorker());
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, loopOpGangVectorWorkerTest) {
TEST_F(OpenACCOpsTest, routineOpTest) {
OwningOpRef<RoutineOp> op =
- b.create<RoutineOp>(loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
+ RoutineOp::create(b, loc, TypeRange{}, ValueRange{});
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasSeq());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->hasVector());
@@ -564,12 +564,12 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), varPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getType(), memrefTy);
@@ -579,24 +579,24 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_FALSE(op->getVarPtrPtr());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -637,17 +637,17 @@ void testShortDataExitOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = b.create<GetDevicePtrOp>(
- loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = GetDevicePtrOp::create(
+ b, loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> accPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(accPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), varPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAccPtr(), accPtr);
@@ -656,24 +656,24 @@ void testShortDataExitOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getStructured());
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr, varPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr, varPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -689,17 +689,17 @@ void testShortDataExitNoVarPtrOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
Location loc, DataClause dataClause) {
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, b.getI32Type());
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> varPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(varPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = b.create<GetDevicePtrOp>(
- loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<GetDevicePtrOp> accPtrOp = GetDevicePtrOp::create(
+ b, loc, varPtr, /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
TypedValue<PointerLikeType> accPtr =
cast<TypedValue<PointerLikeType>>(accPtrOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getAccPtr(), accPtr);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getDataClause(), dataClause);
@@ -707,24 +707,24 @@ void testShortDataExitNoVarPtrOpBuilders(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getStructured());
EXPECT_TRUE(op->getBounds().empty());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op2 = Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/false, /*implicit=*/false);
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getImplicit());
EXPECT_FALSE(op2->getStructured());
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> extent =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 1);
OwningOpRef<DataBoundsOp> bounds =
- b.create<DataBoundsOp>(loc, extent->getResult());
+ DataBoundsOp::create(b, loc, extent->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithBounds =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, bounds->getResult());
EXPECT_FALSE(opWithBounds->getBounds().empty());
EXPECT_EQ(opWithBounds->getBounds().back(), bounds->getResult());
OwningOpRef<Op> opWithName =
- b.create<Op>(loc, accPtr,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
+ Op::create(b, loc, accPtr,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true, "varName");
EXPECT_EQ(opWithName->getNameAttr().str(), "varName");
}
@@ -742,16 +742,16 @@ void testShortDataEntryOpBuildersMappableVar(OpBuilder &b, MLIRContext &context,
auto int64Ty = b.getI64Type();
auto memrefTy = MemRefType::get({}, int64Ty);
OwningOpRef<memref::AllocaOp> varPtrOp =
- b.create<memref::AllocaOp>(loc, memrefTy);
+ memref::AllocaOp::create(b, loc, memrefTy);
SmallVector<Value> indices;
OwningOpRef<memref::LoadOp> loadVarOp =
- b.create<memref::LoadOp>(loc, int64Ty, varPtrOp->getResult(), indices);
+ memref::LoadOp::create(b, loc, int64Ty, varPtrOp->getResult(), indices);
EXPECT_TRUE(isMappableType(loadVarOp->getResult().getType()));
TypedValue<MappableType> var =
cast<TypedValue<MappableType>>(loadVarOp->getResult());
- OwningOpRef<Op> op = b.create<Op>(loc, var,
- /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
+ OwningOpRef<Op> op = Op::create(b, loc, var,
+ /*structured=*/true, /*implicit=*/true);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVar(), var);
EXPECT_EQ(op->getVarPtr(), nullptr);
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
index fecd960d694b1..ef2312398265f 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SCF/LoopLikeSCFOpsTest.cpp
@@ -119,45 +119,45 @@ class SCFLoopLikeTest : public ::testing::Test {
TEST_F(SCFLoopLikeTest, queryUnidimensionalLooplikes) {
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> lb =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 0);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> ub =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 10);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 10);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> step =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 2);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 2);
OwningOpRef<scf::ForOp> forOp =
- b.create<scf::ForOp>(loc, lb.get(), ub.get(), step.get());
+ scf::ForOp::create(b, loc, lb.get(), ub.get(), step.get());
checkUnidimensional(forOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = b.create<scf::ForallOp>(
- loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(lb->getResult()),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = scf::ForallOp::create(
+ b, loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(lb->getResult()),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(ub->getResult()),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>(step->getResult()), ValueRange(), std::nullopt);
checkUnidimensional(forallOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = b.create<scf::ParallelOp>(
- loc, ValueRange(lb->getResult()), ValueRange(ub->getResult()),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = scf::ParallelOp::create(
+ b, loc, ValueRange(lb->getResult()), ValueRange(ub->getResult()),
ValueRange(step->getResult()), ValueRange());
checkUnidimensional(parallelOp.get());
}
TEST_F(SCFLoopLikeTest, queryMultidimensionalLooplikes) {
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> lb =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 0);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> ub =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 10);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 10);
OwningOpRef<arith::ConstantIndexOp> step =
- b.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 2);
+ arith::ConstantIndexOp::create(b, loc, 2);
- OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = b.create<scf::ForallOp>(
- loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ForallOp> forallOp = scf::ForallOp::create(
+ b, loc, ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({ub->getResult(), ub->getResult()}),
ArrayRef<OpFoldResult>({step->getResult(), step->getResult()}),
ValueRange(), std::nullopt);
checkMultidimensional(forallOp.get());
- OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = b.create<scf::ParallelOp>(
- loc, ValueRange({lb->getResult(), lb->getResult()}),
+ OwningOpRef<scf::ParallelOp> parallelOp = scf:...
[truncated]
|
Taken from git history: 9e7834c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (35/n) (#150708) 284a5c2 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/examples` create APIs (31/n) (#150652) c090ed5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (33/n) (#150659) fcbcfe4 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (32/n) (#150657) 258daf5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir` create APIs (34/n) (#150660) c610b24 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (27/n) (#150638) b58ad36 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (30/n) (#150643) 258d04c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (28/n) (#150641) a6bf40d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (29/n) (#150642) dcfc853 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/lib` create APIs (12/n) (#149914) 3f74334 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang` create APIs (13/n) (#149913) a636b7b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (18/n) (#149925) 75aa706 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (17/n) (#149924) 2f53125 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (15/n) (#149921) 967626b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (14/n) (#149920) 588845d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (20/n) (#149927) b043492 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (4/n) (#149879) 8fff238 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (23/n) (#149930) 38976a0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (7/n) (#149889) eaa67a3 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (5/n) (#149887) b0312be Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (19/n) (#149926) 2736fbd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (26/n) (#149933) 4ae9fdc Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (6/n) (#149888) f904cdd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (24/n) (#149931) 972ac59 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (21/n) (#149928) 7b78796 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (25/n) (#149932) c3823af Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (22/n) (#149929) dce6679 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (16/n) (#149922) 9844ba6 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder` create APIs (9/n) (#149917) 5547c6c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder/Runtime` create APIs (10/n) (#149916) a3a007a Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Lower` create APIs (8/n) (#149912) 46f6df0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Transforms` create APIs (11/n) (#149915) b7e332d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `include` create APIs (3/n) (#149687) 6056f94 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update LLVM create APIs (2/n) (#149667) 906295b Maksim Levental [mlir] update affine+arith create APIs (1/n) (#149656)
The update is most likely not what someone wants when looking at the blame for one of these lines. Taken from git history: ``` 9e7834c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (35/n) (#150708) 284a5c2 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/examples` create APIs (31/n) (#150652) c090ed5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (33/n) (#150659) fcbcfe4 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (32/n) (#150657) 258daf5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir` create APIs (34/n) (#150660) c610b24 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (27/n) (#150638) b58ad36 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (30/n) (#150643) 258d04c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (28/n) (#150641) a6bf40d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (29/n) (#150642) dcfc853 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/lib` create APIs (12/n) (#149914) 3f74334 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang` create APIs (13/n) (#149913) a636b7b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (18/n) (#149925) 75aa706 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (17/n) (#149924) 2f53125 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (15/n) (#149921) 967626b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (14/n) (#149920) 588845d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (20/n) (#149927) b043492 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (4/n) (#149879) 8fff238 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (23/n) (#149930) 38976a0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (7/n) (#149889) eaa67a3 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (5/n) (#149887) b0312be Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (19/n) (#149926) 2736fbd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (26/n) (#149933) 4ae9fdc Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (6/n) (#149888) f904cdd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (24/n) (#149931) 972ac59 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (21/n) (#149928) 7b78796 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (25/n) (#149932) c3823af Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (22/n) (#149929) dce6679 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (16/n) (#149922) 9844ba6 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder` create APIs (9/n) (#149917) 5547c6c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder/Runtime` create APIs (10/n) (#149916) a3a007a Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Lower` create APIs (8/n) (#149912) 46f6df0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Transforms` create APIs (11/n) (#149915) b7e332d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `include` create APIs (3/n) (#149687) 6056f94 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update LLVM create APIs (2/n) (#149667) 906295b Maksim Levental [mlir] update affine+arith create APIs (1/n) (#149656) ```
See llvm#147168 for more info.
The update is most likely not what someone wants when looking at the blame for one of these lines. Taken from git history: ``` 9e7834c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (35/n) (llvm#150708) 284a5c2 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/examples` create APIs (31/n) (llvm#150652) c090ed5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (33/n) (llvm#150659) fcbcfe4 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (32/n) (llvm#150657) 258daf5 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir` create APIs (34/n) (llvm#150660) c610b24 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (27/n) (llvm#150638) b58ad36 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (30/n) (llvm#150643) 258d04c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (28/n) (llvm#150641) a6bf40d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (29/n) (llvm#150642) dcfc853 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/lib` create APIs (12/n) (llvm#149914) 3f74334 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang` create APIs (13/n) (llvm#149913) a636b7b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (18/n) (llvm#149925) 75aa706 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (17/n) (llvm#149924) 2f53125 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (15/n) (llvm#149921) 967626b Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (14/n) (llvm#149920) 588845d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (20/n) (llvm#149927) b043492 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (4/n) (llvm#149879) 8fff238 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (23/n) (llvm#149930) 38976a0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (7/n) (llvm#149889) eaa67a3 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (5/n) (llvm#149887) b0312be Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (19/n) (llvm#149926) 2736fbd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/lib` create APIs (26/n) (llvm#149933) 4ae9fdc Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `Conversion` create APIs (6/n) (llvm#149888) f904cdd Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (24/n) (llvm#149931) 972ac59 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (21/n) (llvm#149928) 7b78796 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (25/n) (llvm#149932) c3823af Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (22/n) (llvm#149929) dce6679 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `mlir/Dialect` create APIs (16/n) (llvm#149922) 9844ba6 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder` create APIs (9/n) (llvm#149917) 5547c6c Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Builder/Runtime` create APIs (10/n) (llvm#149916) a3a007a Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Lower` create APIs (8/n) (llvm#149912) 46f6df0 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `flang/Optimizer/Transforms` create APIs (11/n) (llvm#149915) b7e332d Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update `include` create APIs (3/n) (llvm#149687) 6056f94 Maksim Levental [mlir][NFC] update LLVM create APIs (2/n) (llvm#149667) 906295b Maksim Levental [mlir] update affine+arith create APIs (1/n) (llvm#149656) ```
See llvm#147168 for more info.
See #147168 for more info.