-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[SelectionDAG] Handle more opcodes in isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison #147019
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the peekThroughInsertVectorElt code necessary for the test changes? I'm not opposed to adding handling for many opcodes without much test coverage but the INSERT_VECTOR_ELT code looks to be a very special case.
The motivation for peekThroughInsertVectorElt is test/CodeGen/X86/mmx-build-vector.ll (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143103/files#diff-c897e7a69774c6782f9381e10373320d43d5a3bb0a90746a465a80fe67629e3cL485). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you seperate off the peekThroughInsertVectorElt change into a followup PR? I think that's the only thing causing hesitation on this patch - the subvector handling in particular looks trivial.
0476371
to
3d04a3b
Compare
Sure. I rebased and updated the patch to skip the peek through at this stage. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: Björn Pettersson (bjope) ChangesAdd special handling of EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, INSERT_SUBVECTOR, EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, INSERT_VECTOR_ELT and SCALAR_TO_VECTOR in isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison. Make use of DemandedElts to improve the analysis and only check relevant elements for each operand. Also start using DemandedElts in the recursive calls that check isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison for all operands for operations that do not create undef/poison. We can do that for a number of elementwise operations for which the DemandedElts can be applied to every operand (e.g. ADD, OR, BITREVERSE, TRUNCATE). Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147019.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 682d93d0abf3f..ab39123d34dbd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -5461,6 +5461,83 @@ bool SelectionDAG::isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(SDValue Op,
}
return true;
+ case ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR: {
+ SDValue Src = Op.getOperand(0);
+ if (Src.getValueType().isScalableVector())
+ break;
+ uint64_t Idx = Op.getConstantOperandVal(1);
+ unsigned NumSrcElts = Src.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
+ APInt DemandedSrcElts = DemandedElts.zext(NumSrcElts).shl(Idx);
+ return isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(Src, DemandedSrcElts, PoisonOnly,
+ Depth + 1);
+ }
+
+ case ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR: {
+ if (Op.getValueType().isScalableVector())
+ break;
+ SDValue Src = Op.getOperand(0);
+ SDValue Sub = Op.getOperand(1);
+ uint64_t Idx = Op.getConstantOperandVal(2);
+ unsigned NumSubElts = Sub.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
+ APInt DemandedSubElts = DemandedElts.extractBits(NumSubElts, Idx);
+ APInt DemandedSrcElts = DemandedElts;
+ DemandedSrcElts.clearBits(Idx, Idx + NumSubElts);
+
+ if (!!DemandedSubElts && !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(
+ Sub, DemandedSubElts, PoisonOnly, Depth + 1))
+ return false;
+ if (!!DemandedSrcElts && !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(
+ Src, DemandedSrcElts, PoisonOnly, Depth + 1))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ case ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT: {
+ SDValue Src = Op.getOperand(0);
+ auto *IndexC = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1));
+ EVT SrcVT = Src.getValueType();
+ if (SrcVT.isFixedLengthVector() && IndexC &&
+ IndexC->getAPIntValue().ult(SrcVT.getVectorNumElements())) {
+ APInt DemandedSrcElts = APInt::getOneBitSet(SrcVT.getVectorNumElements(),
+ IndexC->getZExtValue());
+ return isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(Src, DemandedSrcElts, PoisonOnly,
+ Depth + 1);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT: {
+ SDValue InVec = Op.getOperand(0);
+ SDValue InVal = Op.getOperand(1);
+ SDValue EltNo = Op.getOperand(2);
+ EVT VT = InVec.getValueType();
+ auto *IndexC = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(EltNo);
+ if (IndexC && VT.isFixedLengthVector() &&
+ IndexC->getZExtValue() < VT.getVectorNumElements()) {
+ if (DemandedElts[IndexC->getZExtValue()] &&
+ !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(InVal, PoisonOnly, Depth + 1))
+ return false;
+ APInt InVecDemandedElts = DemandedElts;
+ InVecDemandedElts.clearBit(IndexC->getZExtValue());
+ if (!!InVecDemandedElts &&
+ !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(InVec, InVecDemandedElts,
+ PoisonOnly, Depth + 1))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR:
+ // Check upper (known undef) elements.
+ if (DemandedElts.ugt(1) && !PoisonOnly)
+ return false;
+ // Check element zero.
+ if (DemandedElts[0] && !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(
+ Op.getOperand(0), PoisonOnly, Depth + 1))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+
case ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR:
return isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(Op.getOperand(0), PoisonOnly,
Depth + 1);
@@ -5483,6 +5560,52 @@ bool SelectionDAG::isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(SDValue Op,
return true;
}
+ case ISD::SHL:
+ case ISD::SRL:
+ case ISD::SRA:
+ // Shift amount operand is checked by canCreateUndefOrPoison. So it is
+ // enough to check operand 0 if Op can't create undef/poison.
+ return !canCreateUndefOrPoison(Op, DemandedElts, PoisonOnly,
+ /*ConsiderFlags*/ true, Depth) &&
+ isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(Op.getOperand(0), DemandedElts,
+ PoisonOnly, Depth + 1);
+
+ case ISD::BSWAP:
+ case ISD::CTPOP:
+ case ISD::BITREVERSE:
+ case ISD::AND:
+ case ISD::OR:
+ case ISD::XOR:
+ case ISD::ADD:
+ case ISD::SUB:
+ case ISD::MUL:
+ case ISD::SADDSAT:
+ case ISD::UADDSAT:
+ case ISD::SSUBSAT:
+ case ISD::USUBSAT:
+ case ISD::SSHLSAT:
+ case ISD::USHLSAT:
+ case ISD::SMIN:
+ case ISD::SMAX:
+ case ISD::UMIN:
+ case ISD::UMAX:
+ case ISD::ZERO_EXTEND:
+ case ISD::SIGN_EXTEND:
+ case ISD::ANY_EXTEND:
+ case ISD::TRUNCATE:
+ case ISD::VSELECT: {
+ // If Op can't create undef/poison and none of its operands are undef/poison
+ // then Op is never undef/poison. A difference from the more common check
+ // below, outside the switch, is that we handle elementwise operations for
+ // which the DemandedElts mask is valid for all operands here.
+ return !canCreateUndefOrPoison(Op, DemandedElts, PoisonOnly,
+ /*ConsiderFlags*/ true, Depth) &&
+ all_of(Op->ops(), [&](SDValue V) {
+ return isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V, DemandedElts,
+ PoisonOnly, Depth + 1);
+ });
+ }
+
// TODO: Search for noundef attributes from library functions.
// TODO: Pointers dereferenced by ISD::LOAD/STORE ops are noundef.
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/div-rem-pair-recomposition-signed.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/div-rem-pair-recomposition-signed.ll
index 661e7bb19641c..d1a0930d8b7b3 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/div-rem-pair-recomposition-signed.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/div-rem-pair-recomposition-signed.ll
@@ -172,10 +172,9 @@ define i128 @scalar_i128(i128 %x, i128 %y, ptr %divdst) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT: movl %esi, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
; X86-NEXT: sbbl %eax, %edi
; X86-NEXT: movl %edi, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
-; X86-NEXT: movl 52(%ebp), %ecx
-; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: movl 52(%ebp), %esi
+; X86-NEXT: movl %esi, %edx
; X86-NEXT: sarl $31, %edx
-; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, %esi
; X86-NEXT: xorl %edx, %esi
; X86-NEXT: movl 48(%ebp), %ecx
; X86-NEXT: xorl %edx, %ecx
@@ -204,14 +203,14 @@ define i128 @scalar_i128(i128 %x, i128 %y, ptr %divdst) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT: sete %al
; X86-NEXT: orb %cl, %al
; X86-NEXT: movb %al, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 1-byte Spill
-; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %eax # 4-byte Reload
-; X86-NEXT: bsrl %eax, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: bsrl %esi, %edx
; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %edx
-; X86-NEXT: addl $32, %edx
-; X86-NEXT: bsrl %esi, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %eax # 4-byte Reload
+; X86-NEXT: bsrl %eax, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: addl $32, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: testl %esi, %esi
-; X86-NEXT: cmovel %edx, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: cmovnel %edx, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: bsrl %ebx, %edx
; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %edx
; X86-NEXT: movl %edi, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
@@ -226,14 +225,14 @@ define i128 @scalar_i128(i128 %x, i128 %y, ptr %divdst) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT: movl %esi, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
; X86-NEXT: orl %esi, %edx
; X86-NEXT: cmovnel %ecx, %edi
-; X86-NEXT: bsrl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %edx # 4-byte Folded Reload
-; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %edx
-; X86-NEXT: addl $32, %edx
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %eax # 4-byte Reload
-; X86-NEXT: bsrl %eax, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: bsrl %eax, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: bsrl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %ecx # 4-byte Folded Reload
; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: addl $32, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: testl %eax, %eax
-; X86-NEXT: cmovel %edx, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: cmovnel %edx, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %ebx # 4-byte Reload
; X86-NEXT: bsrl %ebx, %esi
; X86-NEXT: xorl $31, %esi
@@ -380,9 +379,9 @@ define i128 @scalar_i128(i128 %x, i128 %y, ptr %divdst) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %eax # 4-byte Reload
; X86-NEXT: adcl $-1, %eax
; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
-; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %eax # 4-byte Reload
-; X86-NEXT: adcl $-1, %eax
-; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
+; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %ecx # 4-byte Reload
+; X86-NEXT: adcl $-1, %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p), %ecx # 4-byte Reload
; X86-NEXT: adcl $-1, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, {{[-0-9]+}}(%e{{[sb]}}p) # 4-byte Spill
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr62286.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr62286.ll
index 2d1b7fcbf0239..ce03f8fad4a19 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr62286.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr62286.ll
@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ define i64 @PR62286(i32 %a) {
; AVX1-NEXT: vmovd %edi, %xmm0
; AVX1-NEXT: vpslldq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[0,1,2,3]
; AVX1-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; AVX1-NEXT: vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
+; AVX1-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm2[2,3,4,5,6,7]
; AVX1-NEXT: vpand {{\.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}(%rip), %xmm1, %xmm1
-; AVX1-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm1[2,3,4,5,6,7]
; AVX1-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0
; AVX1-NEXT: vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2,3,2,3]
; AVX1-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm1, %xmm1
@@ -58,12 +59,13 @@ define i64 @PR62286(i32 %a) {
; AVX512-LABEL: PR62286:
; AVX512: # %bb.0:
; AVX512-NEXT: vmovd %edi, %xmm0
-; AVX512-NEXT: vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,1,0]
-; AVX512-NEXT: vpandd {{\.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm1
-; AVX512-NEXT: movw $4369, %ax # imm = 0x1111
+; AVX512-NEXT: movb $8, %al
; AVX512-NEXT: kmovd %eax, %k1
-; AVX512-NEXT: vpaddd %zmm0, %zmm0, %zmm1 {%k1}
-; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %ymm1, %zmm0
+; AVX512-NEXT: vpexpandd %ymm0, %ymm1 {%k1} {z}
+; AVX512-NEXT: vpand {{\.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
+; AVX512-NEXT: vpaddd %ymm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
+; AVX512-NEXT: vpblendd {{.*#+}} ymm0 = ymm0[0],ymm1[1,2,3],ymm0[4],ymm1[5,6,7]
+; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %ymm0, %zmm0
; AVX512-NEXT: vextracti64x4 $1, %zmm0, %ymm1
; AVX512-NEXT: vpaddq %zmm1, %zmm0, %zmm0
; AVX512-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you fix the title to say how it's improved? This is just adding handling of new ops
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bjope please can you merge against trunk? |
Add special handling of EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, INSERT_SUBVECTOR, EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, INSERT_VECTOR_ELT and SCALAR_TO_VECTOR in isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison. Make use of DemandedElts to improve the analysis and only check relevant elements for each operand. Also start using DemandedElts in the recursive calls that check isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison for all operands for operations that do not create undef/poison. We can do that for a number of elementwise operations for which the DemandedElts can be applied to every operand (e.g. ADD, OR, BITREVERSE, TRUNCATE).
3d04a3b
to
5336d0b
Compare
Add special handling of EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, INSERT_SUBVECTOR, EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, INSERT_VECTOR_ELT and SCALAR_TO_VECTOR in isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison. Make use of DemandedElts to improve the analysis and only check relevant elements for each operand.
Also start using DemandedElts in the recursive calls that check isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison for all operands for operations that do not create undef/poison. We can do that for a number of elementwise operations for which the DemandedElts can be applied to every operand (e.g. ADD, OR, BITREVERSE, TRUNCATE).