-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
[SPIRV] Fix type mismatch assertion in insertvalue. #143131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The code was incorrectly converting all undef arguments to i32, while the `spv_insertv` intrinsics only expects that for the first operand, representing the aggregate type.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-spir-v Author: Tim Besard (maleadt) ChangesThe code was incorrectly converting all Fixes #127977 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143131.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVEmitIntrinsics.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVEmitIntrinsics.cpp
index cc95fde6a516d..8e467b5c700b0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVEmitIntrinsics.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVEmitIntrinsics.cpp
@@ -1711,11 +1711,12 @@ Instruction *SPIRVEmitIntrinsics::visitInsertValueInst(InsertValueInst &I) {
B.SetInsertPoint(&I);
SmallVector<Type *, 1> Types = {I.getInsertedValueOperand()->getType()};
SmallVector<Value *> Args;
- for (auto &Op : I.operands())
- if (isa<UndefValue>(Op))
- Args.push_back(UndefValue::get(B.getInt32Ty()));
- else
- Args.push_back(Op);
+ Value *AggregateOp = I.getAggregateOperand();
+ if (isa<UndefValue>(AggregateOp))
+ Args.push_back(UndefValue::get(B.getInt32Ty()));
+ else
+ Args.push_back(AggregateOp);
+ Args.push_back(I.getInsertedValueOperand());
for (auto &Op : I.indices())
Args.push_back(B.getInt32(Op));
Instruction *NewI =
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/SPIRV/instructions/insertvalue-undef-ptr.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/SPIRV/instructions/insertvalue-undef-ptr.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..0676652ac1b39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/SPIRV/instructions/insertvalue-undef-ptr.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -O0 -mtriple=spirv64-unknown-unknown %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: Begin function original_testcase
+define fastcc void @original_testcase() {
+top:
+ ; CHECK: OpCompositeInsert
+ %0 = insertvalue [1 x ptr] zeroinitializer, ptr poison, 0
+ ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: Begin function additional_testcases
+define fastcc void @additional_testcases() {
+top:
+ ; Test with different pointer types
+ ; CHECK: OpCompositeInsert
+ %1 = insertvalue [1 x ptr] zeroinitializer, ptr undef, 0
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: OpCompositeInsert
+ %2 = insertvalue {ptr, i32} zeroinitializer, ptr poison, 0
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: OpCompositeInsert
+ %3 = insertvalue {ptr, ptr} undef, ptr null, 0
+
+ ; Test with undef aggregate
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: OpCompositeInsert
+ %4 = insertvalue [1 x ptr] undef, ptr undef, 0
+
+ ret void
+}
|
You can test this locally with the following command:git diff -U0 --pickaxe-regex -S '([^a-zA-Z0-9#_-]undef[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]|UndefValue::get)' 'HEAD~1' HEAD llvm/test/CodeGen/SPIRV/instructions/insertvalue-undef-ptr.ll llvm/lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVEmitIntrinsics.cpp The following files introduce new uses of undef:
Undef is now deprecated and should only be used in the rare cases where no replacement is possible. For example, a load of uninitialized memory yields In tests, avoid using For example, this is considered a bad practice: define void @fn() {
...
br i1 undef, ...
} Please use the following instead: define void @fn(i1 %cond) {
...
br i1 %cond, ...
} Please refer to the Undefined Behavior Manual for more information. |
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <[email protected]>
The code was incorrectly converting all
undef
arguments toi32
, while thespv_insertv
intrinsics only expects that for the first operand, representing the aggregate type.Fixes #127977