Skip to content

Conversation

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

@cclauss cclauss commented Jan 27, 2025

https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell

codespell polly --skip="*.pdf,polly/lib/External/*" --write-changes \
  --ignore-words-list=couter,createor,distribues,doble,identty,indention,indx,olt,ore,padd,sais,te,theses

@Meinersbur

@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

/// @param Prepend If true, will add @p Access before all other instructions
/// (instead of appending it).
void addAccess(MemoryAccess *Access, bool Preprend = false);
void addAccess(MemoryAccess *Access, bool Prepend = false);
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cclauss cclauss Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code change: Extra review, please.

This change matches with the correct spelling at:

void ScopStmt::addAccess(MemoryAccess *Access, bool Prepend) {

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

return

self.__class__.initalized = True
self.__class__.initialized = True
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cclauss cclauss Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code change: Extra review, please.

This change matches with the correct spelling three lines above.

return

self.__class__.initalized = True
self.__class__.initialized = True
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cclauss cclauss Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code change: Extra review, please.

This change matches with the correct spelling three lines above.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems indeed an error that was supposed to avoid double initialization

@Meinersbur Meinersbur changed the title polly: Fix typos discovered by codespell [Polly] Fix typos discovered by codespell Jan 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Meinersbur Meinersbur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you

If you don't have push rights, please ping me and I will push the button for you.

/// @param Prepend If true, will add @p Access before all other instructions
/// (instead of appending it).
void addAccess(MemoryAccess *Access, bool Preprend = false);
void addAccess(MemoryAccess *Access, bool Prepend = false);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

return

self.__class__.initalized = True
self.__class__.initialized = True
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems indeed an error that was supposed to avoid double initialization

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor Author

cclauss commented Jan 27, 2025

I do not have push rights. Below it says:

2 workflows awaiting approval

@Meinersbur Meinersbur merged commit 5aafc6d into llvm:main Jan 27, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

@cclauss Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

@Meinersbur
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution!

@cclauss cclauss deleted the polly-codespell branch January 27, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants