[clang][modules] Change --print-library-module-manifest-path to --print-std-module-manifest-path ??

[evantorrie]

In #76451, @ChuanqiXu9 made this suggestion

def print_std_module_manifest_path : Flag<["-", "--"], "print-std-module-manifest-path">,

While the name of the variable (via the def ...) was changed, the actual text of the command line argument was left as --print-library-module-manifest-path.

Has this ship sailed? Or is there still time to standardize this so that the option better reflects its semantics – which is to print only the C++ standard library modules manifest -- not "general" library module manifests as I understand it.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/issue-subscribers-clang-modules

Author: ET (evantorrie)

In #76451, @ChuanqiXu9 made [this suggestion](https://github.com//pull/76451#discussion_r1437330950)

def print_std_module_manifest_path : Flag<["-", "--"], "print-std-module-manifest-path">,

While the name of the variable (via the def ...) was changed, the actual text of the command line argument was left as --print-library-module-manifest-path.

Has this ship sailed? Or is there still time to standardize this so that the option better reflects its semantics – which is to print only the C++ standard library modules manifest -- not "general" library module manifests as I understand it.

[ChuanqiXu9]

If the issue is about renaming, I feel fine to add an alias for it.