Skip to content

Conversation

@gitoleg
Copy link
Collaborator

@gitoleg gitoleg commented Nov 21, 2023

I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the get_member verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well

Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! @sitio-couto any input?

Copy link
Collaborator

@sitio-couto sitio-couto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bcardosolopes LGTM too!

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes merged commit fe700fe into llvm:main Nov 22, 2023
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
eZWALT pushed a commit to eZWALT/clangir that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
eZWALT pushed a commit to eZWALT/clangir that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
eZWALT pushed a commit to eZWALT/clangir that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
bruteforceboy pushed a commit to bruteforceboy/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
Hugobros3 pushed a commit to shady-gang/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
keryell pushed a commit to keryell/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close #256 as well
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GetMemberOp verification failure on recursive types

3 participants