-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 175
[CIR][IR] harden the get_member verifier #330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! @sitio-couto any input?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bcardosolopes LGTM too!
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close llvm#256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) ) And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think? And we can close #256 as well
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many thanks to #303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the
get_memberverification back, with no checks for incomplete types. What do you think?And we can close #256 as well