Skip to content

Conversation

PikachuHyA
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@PikachuHyA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

After this patch, TBAA support for enum types has been implemented. How should we handle the cir::MissingFeatures::tbaaTagForEnum() function? Currently, I have marked the function to return true, but I left the original assertion assert(cir::MissingFeatures::tbaaTagForEnum()); in place.

@bcardosolopes
Copy link
Member

How should we handle the cir::MissingFeatures::tbaaTagForEnum() function?

Do you consider it done? If so we should remove

Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, few nits

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes merged commit d9eeb83 into llvm:main Mar 5, 2025
6 checks passed
@PikachuHyA PikachuHyA deleted the tbaa-enum branch March 6, 2025 02:07
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
terapines-osc-cir pushed a commit to Terapines/clangir that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants