Skip to content

Match CodeGen's handling of visibility #992

@smeenai

Description

@smeenai

Our handling of visibility (in the LLVM and object file sense, not the MLIR sense) is a bit haphazard and differs from CodeGen's; see #990 for an example. We should rework it to match CodeGen, and make sure any relevant missing feature asserts are updated.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions