Skip to content

Trivial #3246 followups. #3959

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jul 24, 2025

👋 I see @tankyleo was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.93%. Comparing base (55baa15) to head (86c186a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3959      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.94%   88.93%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         173      173              
  Lines      123794   123794              
  Branches   123794   123794              
==========================================
- Hits       110114   110094      -20     
- Misses      11227    11242      +15     
- Partials     2453     2458       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 22.21% <ø> (ø)
tests 88.76% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz jkczyz removed the request for review from tankyleo July 24, 2025 21:55
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the 2025-07-3246-followups branch from 974ffeb to 1f4d837 Compare July 24, 2025 22:22
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oops, fixed, no changes just comit reordering.

Copy link
Member

@shaavan shaavan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just one small nit

Instead of making vague reference to "those docs", indicate exactly
which docs we're suggesting the user go hunt for. Also, for variant
methods, just say "see the original method for more details" rather
than trying to spell out all the things that exist in the
documentation for the other method. This avoids things getting
stale and doesn't reduce the information users have.
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the 2025-07-3246-followups branch from 1f4d837 to 86c186a Compare July 25, 2025 13:44
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oops bad rebase sorry, fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@jkczyz jkczyz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI failure looks like test flakiness

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yea, I'm not quite sure what those issues are. Some DNS issue (though DNS lookups tested manually on the server complete ~instantly)...

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 5ceb625 into lightningdevkit:main Jul 25, 2025
26 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants