Skip to content

Conversation

@valentinewallace
Copy link
Contributor

@valentinewallace valentinewallace commented Nov 15, 2023

Previously, if some holding cell HTLCs had skimmed fees present and some
didn't, we would fail to deserialize a Channel. See added test coverage. Indirectly pointed out by Matt here.

Just the last commit. Based on #2540 for ease of testing.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

Previously, if some holding cell HTLCs have skimmed fees present and some
don't, we would fail to deserialize a Channel. See added test coverage.
@valentinewallace
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased.

Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with the simpler code, but we could also fix it with just replacing the for _ in 0..idxs with for _ in 1..idx.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Gonna go ahead and land this. The excess few bytes in ChannelManager serialization aren't really worth sweating, the tests demonstrate the error, and the new code is much simpler.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 78e88e9 into lightningdevkit:main Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants