-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
Suggest faster ping in PeerManager::timer_tick_occurred docs
#1035
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
TheBlueMatt
merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:main
from
TheBlueMatt:2021-08-faster-pings
Aug 9, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1372,9 +1372,12 @@ impl<Descriptor: SocketDescriptor, CM: Deref, RM: Deref, L: Deref> PeerManager<D | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// This function should be called roughly once every 30 seconds. | ||
| /// It will send pings to each peer and disconnect those which did not respond to the last | ||
| /// round of pings. | ||
| /// Send pings to each peer and disconnect those which did not respond to the last round of | ||
| /// pings. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// This may be called on any timescale you want, however, roughly once every five to ten | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nit: s/want, however,/want. However,
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Don't think it needs a new sentence here? |
||
| /// seconds is preferred. The call rate determines both how often we send a ping to our peers | ||
| /// and how much time they have to respond before we disconnect them. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// May call [`send_data`] on all [`SocketDescriptor`]s. Thus, be very careful with reentrancy | ||
| /// issues! | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It reads to me as odd to disconnect peers this way, rather than explicitly through some
disconnect_peer()or so APIThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, to some extent I agree, but at the same times its what has happened - the timer should have fired twice, so that's just what we do. The
PeerManagercould in the future tweak how it handles timer events and I think this would be more correct.