Skip to content

Conversation

sjjpo2002
Copy link

This PR is to resolve the issue reported here:
#143

Copy link
Collaborator

@eyurtsev eyurtsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Proposal for operator makes sense, but requires the following work:

  1. Differentiation between contains all vs. contains any.
  2. Unit tests for the given operator.
  3. PR summary that explains the semantics.
  4. Undoing unrelated code changes.

I may push a change for this in a bit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants