Durable (non-shared) local storage management

[smarterclayton]

Feature Description

• One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): Make locally attached (non-network attached) storage available as a persistent volume source.
• Primary contact (assignee): @msau42 @vishh
• Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-apps-feature-requests
• Design proposal link (community repo): [Proposal] Improve Local Storage Management community#306
• Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred:
  • @jsafrane
  • @saad-ali
• Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs):
  • @thockin
• Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
  • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.7/1.8
  • Beta release target (x.y): 1.10
  • Stable release target (x.y): 1.14

[davidopp]

I assume this is kubernetes/kubernetes#7562 ?

And that kubernetes/kubernetes#30044 is related?

[smarterclayton]

Yes and yes. Consensus is to see if we can pull together a design at most in 1.5

[bprashanth]

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage @jingxu97

[thockin]

I think we can commit to that.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Prashanth B notifications@github.com
wrote:

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage
https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes/teams/sig-storage @jingxu97
https://github.com/jingxu97

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#121 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFVgVCoNyQWhL1_AAMD0eE1Uh79jaMWsks5qyxIggaJpZM4KR2_S
.

[jingxu97]

Yes, I will definitely spend more time on this after this short release
cycle for 1.5. Thanks!

Jing

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Tim Hockin notifications@github.com
wrote:

I think we can commit to that.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Prashanth B notifications@github.com
wrote:

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage
https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes/teams/sig-storage @jingxu97
https://github.com/jingxu97

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/
121#issuecomment-252810762>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFVgVCoNyQWhL1_
AAMD0eE1Uh79jaMWsks5qyxIggaJpZM4KR2_S>
.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#121 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASSNxQlkIyJ98tTTTqNRkJh2JB3OtI-jks5qyyRJgaJpZM4KR2_S
.

• Jing