Skip to content

Conversation

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jun 30, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #10852

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Jun 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from enxebre and g-gaston June 30, 2025 13:02
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 30, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @JoelSpeed @fabriziopandini @sivchari

@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs label Jun 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jun 30, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

// bindPort sets the secure port for the API Server to bind to.
// Defaults to 6443.
// +optional
// +kubebuilder:validation:Minimum=1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume the 0 value for bind would mean random port and wouldn't be appropriate here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly!

Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer sbueringer Jun 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Basically if it even works APIserver would bind on a random port (InitConfiguration) and then the later Nodes would try to join on a random port (JoinConfiguration)

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 08d5fcde772ca354a244a40fdc6effa78f6b030d

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b2def80 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 30, 2025
27 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone Jun 30, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-minimum branch June 30, 2025 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants