Skip to content

Conversation

thesuperzapper
Copy link
Member

This PR makes it so that our up-and-coming approvers (@andyatmiami - controller, backend /// @paulovmr - frontend) are automatically assigned as a reviewer in their respective areas.

This is in line with the code review process that should enable people to get to approver once they consistently lgtm PRs in a state which the approvers would have merged.

Additionally, it seems like we can set labels in the OWNERS files which should automatically apply those labels to PRs which change code under those paths. Hopefully this works, but we will see after we merge.

@andyatmiami
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

pair-programmed with @thesuperzapper one the construction of this PR... excited about the changes.

@thesuperzapper
Copy link
Member Author

/ok-to-test

@thesuperzapper
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: thesuperzapper

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit ca3289c into kubeflow:notebooks-v2 Jun 26, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Triage to Done in Kubeflow Notebooks Jun 26, 2025
@thesuperzapper thesuperzapper deleted the add-reviewers-to-v2 branch June 26, 2025 21:42
@thesuperzapper
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, it turns out that Kubeflow's prow does not have the owners-label plugin enabled, so I have raised a PR to enable in the google config repo: GoogleCloudPlatform/oss-test-infra#2497

bhaktinarvekar pushed a commit to bhaktinarvekar/notebooks that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants