Skip to content

libbpf: usdt aarch64 arg parsing support #302

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

libbpf: usdt aarch64 arg parsing support #302

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: usdt aarch64 arg parsing support
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=631130

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: f4fd706
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=631130
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: aa1b02e
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=631130
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 0f86199
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=631130
version: 2

@alan-maguire
libbpf: usdt aarch64 arg parsing support
94f121c 
Parsing of USDT arguments is architecture-specific; on aarch64 it is
relatively easy since registers used are x[0-31], sp.  Format is
slightly different compared to x86_64; forms are

- "size @ [ reg[,offset] ]" for dereferences, for example
  "-8 @ [ sp, 76 ]" ; " -4 @ [ sp ]"
- "size @ reg" for register values; for example
  "-4@x0"
- "size @ value" for raw values; for example
  "-8@1"

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=631130 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/631130=>bpf-next branch April 11, 2022 22:45
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for arm64
5f6395f 
Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from
BPF test_progs selftests:

  # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap
  #115/1   ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK
  #115/2   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK
  #115/3   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK
  #115     ldsx_insn:OK
  #302/1   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK
  #302/2   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK
  #302/3   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK
  #302/4   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK
  #302/5   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK
  #302/6   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK
  #302     verifier_bswap:OK
  #316/1   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK
  #316/2   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK
  #316     verifier_gotol:OK
  #324/1   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK
  #324/2   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #324/3   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK
  #324/4   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #324/5   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK
  #324/6   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #324/7   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK
  #324/8   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK
  #324/9   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324/10  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK
  #324/11  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324     verifier_ldsx:OK
  #335/1   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK
  #335/2   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/3   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK
  #335/4   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/5   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK
  #335/6   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/7   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK
  #335/8   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/9   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK
  #335/10  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #335/11  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/12  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/13  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/14  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/15  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK
  #335/16  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #335/17  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/18  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/19  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/20  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/21  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK
  #335/22  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/23  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK
  #335/24  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK
  #335     verifier_movsx:OK
  #347/1   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/2   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/3   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/4   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/5   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/6   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/7   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/8   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/9   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/10  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/11  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/12  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/13  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/14  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/15  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/16  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/17  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/18  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/19  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/20  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/21  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/22  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/23  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/24  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/25  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/26  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/27  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/28  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/29  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/30  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/31  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/32  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/33  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/34  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/35  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/36  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/37  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/38  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/39  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/40  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/41  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/42  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/43  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/44  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/45  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/46  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/47  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/48  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/49  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/50  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/51  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/52  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/53  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/54  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/55  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/56  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/57  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/58  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/59  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/60  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/61  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/62  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/63  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/64  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/65  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/66  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/67  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/68  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/69  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/70  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/71  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/72  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/73  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/74  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/75  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/76  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/77  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/78  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/79  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/80  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/81  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/82  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/83  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/84  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/85  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/86  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/87  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/88  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/89  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/90  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/91  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/92  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/93  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/94  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/95  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/96  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/97  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/98  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/99  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347     verifier_sdiv:OK
  Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
8a79b70 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
d4469e0 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
de2b5c0 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
ae9cdd7 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
00b7d4b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
51d5786 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5232400 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
4094515 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
c6b7281 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
fa5de3d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
0f2a3d4 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
36e85dd 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
c1e69a5 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
604ff7a 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
1cc4275 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
8087485 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
3734ee1 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
fcbf23e 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
4ecc2cb 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
b6b2ed5 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
7b9eeff 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
871a198 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
d31261b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
2a7a6c4 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
d8ef0ac 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
9d11c23 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
b9653c6 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
1c038b2 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
fb56a23 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
cbaa0c6 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
038336b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
35cb6c7 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
6fd460d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
3d05580 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
db4602a 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
eb30348 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted bpf-next V2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kernel-patches-bot @alan-maguire