Skip to content

Conversation

@phipsgabler
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #165.

I'm not quite sure whether this is considered breaking; it changes behaviour of equality for some of the methods...?

@jw3126
Copy link
Owner

jw3126 commented Nov 22, 2021

I'm not quite sure whether this is considered breaking; it changes behaviour of equality for some of the methods...?

Yeah to me it is a bug fix, but the interpretation that this changes behavior of equality is also valid. I don't feel strongly, but since we need a decision, let's make it a patch release.

Copy link
Owner

@jw3126 jw3126 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just needs a version bump as discussed above. Thanks @phipsgabler !

@jw3126 jw3126 merged commit bff69d5 into jw3126:master Dec 4, 2021
@jw3126
Copy link
Owner

jw3126 commented Dec 4, 2021

Thanks and sorry for the delay!

@phipsgabler phipsgabler deleted the phg/equality branch December 5, 2021 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Possibility of loosening type-strict equality of indices

2 participants