Skip to content

Conversation

@blegat
Copy link
Member

@blegat blegat commented Oct 25, 2025

No description provided.

@schillic
Copy link

schillic commented Nov 8, 2025

Could you try again, now that SymbolicWedderburn was updated?

@blegat
Copy link
Member Author

blegat commented Nov 18, 2025

You need to apply your changes to the release-0.7 branch

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is another occurrence of IntDisjointSets on this branch here that should be renamed to IntDisjointSet.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this was a merge error. On my branch, I did that change.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.86%. Comparing base (512b9a4) to head (ac06229).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-0.7     #406   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        61.86%   61.86%           
============================================
  Files               37       37           
  Lines             2116     2116           
============================================
  Hits              1309     1309           
  Misses             807      807           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants