Skip to content

Conversation

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented Dec 28, 2021

Pretty happy with this - while the "feature" itself isn't one I think we really need, implementing it wasn't too hard and it made me realise how to greatly simplify the fixer so now we're getting support for square bracket accessors for free + no longer have a couple of theoretical throws 🎉

Fixes #369

@G-Rath G-Rath merged commit 73984a7 into main Dec 30, 2021
@G-Rath G-Rath deleted the support-square-brackets branch December 30, 2021 21:18
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2021
## [25.3.3](v25.3.2...v25.3.3) (2021-12-30)

### Bug Fixes

* **prefer-to-contain:** support square bracket accessors ([#1009](#1009)) ([73984a7](73984a7))
* **prefer-to-have-length:** support square bracket accessors ([#1010](#1010)) ([9e70f55](9e70f55))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 25.3.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[prefer-to-contain] handle bracket accessor properties

2 participants