Skip to content

fix: make stateful builder singleton, upgrade context #112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2022

Conversation

aaron-steinfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Builder updates give it state, so making it a singleton. Also upgrading grpc context to improve logging and claim access.

Testing

Verified E2E

@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2022 01:43
@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results

98 tests  ±0   98 ✔️ ±0   36s ⏱️ -2s
32 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
32 files   ±0     0 ±0 

Results for commit 103a6cf. ± Comparison against base commit 5a32706.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #112 (103a6cf) into main (5a32706) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #112   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     58.35%   58.35%           
  Complexity      256      256           
=========================================
  Files            87       87           
  Lines          1323     1323           
  Branches         39       39           
=========================================
  Hits            772      772           
  Misses          521      521           
  Partials         30       30           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 58.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...graphql/utils/grpc/PlatformGrpcContextBuilder.java 96.29% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants