Add support setuptools?
#47
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
hey sorry for the very late reply, I've been traveling a lot and am stretched super thin right now as I'm trying to catch up. Generally speaking, and as mentioned in #37, I'm open to making it multi-backend (or frontend? which is even which here?)! If we'd get out of the gate with three backends right away, it might even be worth it to rename the project and make hatch-fancy-pypi-readme just depend on it. Even looks like fancy-pypi-readme is still free on PyPI. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, I was recently wondering how much different/complex would it be to support the same functionality of
hatch-fancy-pypi-readmein setuptools.After looking at the
hooks.pyfile, I noticed that the hook implementation for setuptools would not be too much different than the one for hatch...This PR contains a preliminary proof of concept.
Please let me know if you have interest on this and I can follow up with any required changes (e.g. docs)
Otherwise please also feel free to close the PR.
Obs.: Coverage does not seem to consider test in subprocess...