Updated template refs used with useTemplateRef
#348
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updated template refs used with `useTemplateRef` to not match its reference variable name, as a workaround to avoid the vue warning ("Set operation on key "value" failed: target is readonly")
Fix references to nodeElement in TreeViewNode tests
Bump version to 7.0.1
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated template refs used with
useTemplateRefto not match its reference variable name, as a workaround to avoid the vue warning ("Set operation on key "value" failed: target is readonly")IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.
Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.
Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:
Explain the details for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Make sure you've covered the following as needed:
Closing issues
closes #346