Logically separet srpm macros and add example specfiles #42
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jcajka
changed the title
jcajka
changed the title
|
@nim-nim WDYT? |
|
I mostly think the "separate srpm" bit is wrong as the source layout mirrors the rpm directory tree which does not include any "srpm" directory As for the spec examples they won't work, better to have a working spec in Fedora that can serve as example than a broken example in the project source and a broken spec in Fedora You have working packages and specs that are complete enough to work and boostrap even on el7 without any manual intervention there: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/More_Go_Packaging/package/go-srpm-macros/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.