Make sure _get and _set dispatch up the class hierarchy
#1539
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@dsnopek this is in response to my question from chat. It seems a bit odd to me that
_get_property_listdispatches up the class hierarchy while calls to_getand_setdo not and expect the developer to call the super type internally. I'm not sure whether we want to alter this behavior or leave it as-is and document this nuance for others who may prefer to use these override methods for property management.This change also seems to align the GDExtension behavior with C++ modules, too.