Experiment (NOT FOR MERGING): Add test to stress insert ... select for Issue

[guillep2k]

This is a follow-up of #7950; i.e. an attempt to add tests for #7944. Se my comment at #7950 (comment)

I'm not sure whether this should be included in the master branch, but the tests are worth sharing IMO.

[guillep2k]

Something wrong with the issue/comment template? Mmm....

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #7959 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 55.55%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7959      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.48%   41.49%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         479      479              
  Lines       63964    63966       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        26534    26540       +6     
+ Misses      33975    33970       -5     
- Partials     3455     3456       +1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
models/issue.go	50.03% <55.55%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
modules/log/log.go	69.36% <0%> (-2.71%)	⬇️
models/repo_list.go	72.5% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
models/gpg_key.go	56.66% <0%> (+0.83%)	⬆️
routers/repo/view.go	43.54% <0%> (+1.01%)	⬆️
models/unit.go	67.56% <0%> (+5.4%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f83db07...87b38a3. Read the comment docs.

[guillep2k]

This is not working as intended... yet.

[guillep2k]

The good news is that I've managed to create a test that can make this fail.
The bad news is that I've managed to create a test that can make this fail.

[guillep2k]

Added transaction support

[guillep2k]

@lunny Unfortunately, adding transactions did not make any difference.

[guillep2k]

Closing this in favor of #8005, which is independent of the method implemented in models.newIssue().