Update ureq to 3.x (#834)

[algesten]

Update from ureq 2.x to 3.x. In ureq 3.x, rustls API is in itself not
exposed. That simplifies some of the TLS config. Furthermore the
webpki-roots are bundled and updated using patch-versions.

Close #834

[Swatinem]

nice, the code looks a lot simpler and there is less manual steps involved 🎉

IMO this should be good to go, but a cargo update can’t hurt.

[Swatinem]

just curious, what is the difference to webpki-roots? or is this complementary?

Maybe its a good idea to run a cargo update as well, to harmonize the versions, and give cargo an opportunity to maybe remove some duplicates.

[algesten]

webpki-roots is optimized for rustls, while webpki-root-certs is more generic so it can be used with other TLS backends.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.36%. Comparing base (c92d8d8) to head (50c7c6e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #835      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.85%   73.36%   +0.51%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        7732     7678      -54     
==========================================
  Hits         5633     5633              
+ Misses       2099     2045      -54     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Swatinem]

Looks like base64ct has already updated to rust 2024. Maybe you can use the MSRV-aware solver to make sure we downgrade to a compatible version?

[algesten]

Looks like base64ct has already updated to rust 2024. Maybe you can use the MSRV-aware solver to make sure we downgrade to a compatible version?

I'll have a look!

[lcian]

Thank you @algesten !
I've merged master and added a changelog entry.
Anything else you want to change or can we go ahead and merge this?

[algesten]

Looks good to me!