Skip to content

feat(utils): Try to optimize bundle size around type checks #4300

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2021
Merged

feat(utils): Try to optimize bundle size around type checks #4300

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2021

Conversation

@mitsuhiko
Copy link
Contributor

@mitsuhiko mitsuhiko commented Dec 15, 2021

No description provided.

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad added this to the Treeshaking / Bundle Size milestone Dec 15, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2021

size-limit report

Path Base Size (1397a0a) Current Size Change
@sentry/browser - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 21.21 KB 21.21 KB +0.02% 🔺
@sentry/browser - CDN Bundle (minified) 68.58 KB 68.4 KB -0.27% 🔽
@sentry/browser - Webpack 22.92 KB 22.95 KB +0.13% 🔺
@sentry/browser - Webpack - gzip = false 79.49 KB 79.32 KB -0.22% 🔽
@sentry/react - Webpack 22.95 KB 22.98 KB +0.13% 🔺
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack 47.43 KB 47.45 KB +0.05% 🔺
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 29.4 KB 29.41 KB +0.03% 🔺

@mitsuhiko mitsuhiko merged commit 15ab761 into master Dec 15, 2021
@mitsuhiko mitsuhiko deleted the feature/smaller-type-checks branch December 15, 2021 13:55
onurtemizkan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2021
@mitsuhiko @onurtemizkan
feat(utils): Try to optimize bundle size around type checks (#4300)
c1fb615
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Tree shaking / Bundle Size

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mitsuhiko @sl0thentr0py @AbhiPrasad