feat(core): Deprecate scope.getSpan() & scope.setSpan()
#10114
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These APIs are not compatible with OTEL tracing, and thus will not be public API anymore in v8. In v8, we'll add new (?) methods to the scope that are "internal", as for non-node based SDKs we'll still need to keep the active span on the scope. But these should not be reflected publicly, and not in types' Scope. note that we'll also need to make sure to use types' `Scope` for all callbacks etc., which we currently don't do.
Lms24
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2024
Contributor
size-limit report 📦
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These APIs are not compatible with OTEL tracing, and thus will not be public API anymore in v8.
In v8, we'll add new (?) methods to the scope that are "internal", as for non-node based SDKs we'll still need to keep the active span on the scope. But these should not be reflected publicly, and not in types' Scope.
Note that we'll also need to make sure to use types'
Scopefor all callbacks etc., which we currently don't do.