-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.4k
[Impeller] disable Vulkan on known bad exynos SoCs. #163236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
matanlurey
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
autosubmit label was removed for flutter/flutter/163236, because - The status or check suite Mac mac_unopt has failed. Please fix the issues identified (or deflake) before re-applying this label. |
jonahwilliams
pushed a commit
to jonahwilliams/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
The common theme in: * flutter#160854 * flutter#160804 * flutter#158091 Is that the Samsung exynos chipset has problems with AHB imports. Unfortunately some of the reported bugs are hard crashes/. While I couldn't reproduce the crash itself, it does indicate to me that attempting to feature detect if AHB imports work is probably too risky (and potentially slow, as we'd have to do a read back). While the Vulkan drivers otherwise work, the deivces in question are not able to reliably import AHBs which prevents platform views from working. This may not fix all issues as there could be different SoC models that also have problems. I considered removing 29 support as well, but there are a large number of APi 29 devices that work fine.
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
This was referenced Feb 19, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
auto-submit bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
…63265) The common theme in: * #160854 * #160804 * #158091 Is that the Samsung exynos chipset has problems with AHB imports. Unfortunately some of the reported bugs are hard crashes/. While I couldn't reproduce the crash itself, it does indicate to me that attempting to feature detect if AHB imports work is probably too risky (and potentially slow, as we'd have to do a read back). While the Vulkan drivers otherwise work, the deivces in question are not able to reliably import AHBs which prevents platform views from working. This may not fix all issues as there could be different SoC models that also have problems. I considered removing 29 support as well, but there are a large number of APi 29 devices that work fine.
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
9 tasks
Fintasys
pushed a commit
to Fintasys/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
…) (flutter#163265) The common theme in: * flutter#160854 * flutter#160804 * flutter#158091 Is that the Samsung exynos chipset has problems with AHB imports. Unfortunately some of the reported bugs are hard crashes/. While I couldn't reproduce the crash itself, it does indicate to me that attempting to feature detect if AHB imports work is probably too risky (and potentially slow, as we'd have to do a read back). While the Vulkan drivers otherwise work, the deivces in question are not able to reliably import AHBs which prevents platform views from working. This may not fix all issues as there could be different SoC models that also have problems. I considered removing 29 support as well, but there are a large number of APi 29 devices that work fine.
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll
added a commit
to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
engine
flutter/engine related. See also e: labels.
platform-android
Android applications specifically
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The common theme in:
Is that the Samsung exynos chipset has problems with AHB imports. Unfortunately some of the reported bugs are hard crashes/. While I couldn't reproduce the crash itself, it does indicate to me that attempting to feature detect if AHB imports work is probably too risky (and potentially slow, as we'd have to do a read back).
While the Vulkan drivers otherwise work, the deivces in question are not able to reliably import AHBs which prevents platform views from working.
This may not fix all issues as there could be different SoC models that also have problems. I considered removing 29 support as well, but there are a large number of APi 29 devices that work fine.