Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@dnfield
Copy link
Contributor

@dnfield dnfield commented Jul 13, 2021

Migrate scenario app to NNBD

@dnfield dnfield requested review from gspencergoog and xster July 13, 2021 17:28
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Jul 13, 2021
@dnfield dnfield requested a review from zanderso July 13, 2021 17:34
@dnfield dnfield added the waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land. label Jul 13, 2021
@fluttergithubbot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is not suitable for automatic merging in its current state.

  • This commit has empty status or empty checks. Please check the Google CLA status is present and Flutter Dashboard application has multiple checks.

@dnfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnfield commented Jul 13, 2021

@godofredoc @keyonghan - I'm not sure what's controlling the filtering here, but this should have triggered some Android and/or iOS builds. I think we probably don't do the iOS build on presubmit, but I'm pretty sure the Android one would have run. I'll see if I can find where the filter is...

@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot removed the waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land. label Jul 13, 2021
@dnfield dnfield merged commit 462d245 into flutter:master Jul 13, 2021
@dnfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnfield commented Jul 13, 2021

Errr... I'm not sure what that bot message means and I just hit the land button.

@dnfield dnfield deleted the scenario_nnbd branch July 13, 2021 17:59
@keyonghan
Copy link
Contributor

@godofredoc @keyonghan - I'm not sure what's controlling the filtering here, but this should have triggered some Android and/or iOS builds. I think we probably don't do the iOS build on presubmit, but I'm pretty sure the Android one would have run. I'll see if I can find where the filter is...

It is controlled by run_if in .ci.yaml. Here no LUCI builders are scheduled, I guess some delay, or cocoon backend error when triggering/scheduling. /cc @yusufm Do you mind helping take a look?

@dnfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnfield commented Jul 13, 2021

Ahh ok - it wasn't a runIf issue, it looks like they just didn't get scheduled.

zanderso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
zanderso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
dnfield added a commit to dnfield/engine that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/flutter that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
dnfield added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
* Revert "Revert "NNBD migration for scenario_app (#27362)" (#27364)"

This reverts commit 57720b2.

* analysis issues

* no sound null safety because frontend_server is not
moffatman pushed a commit to moffatman/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2021
moffatman pushed a commit to moffatman/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2021
moffatman pushed a commit to moffatman/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2021
* Revert "Revert "NNBD migration for scenario_app (flutter#27362)" (flutter#27364)"

This reverts commit 57720b2.

* analysis issues

* no sound null safety because frontend_server is not
naudzghebre pushed a commit to naudzghebre/engine that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
naudzghebre pushed a commit to naudzghebre/engine that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
naudzghebre pushed a commit to naudzghebre/engine that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
* Revert "Revert "NNBD migration for scenario_app (flutter#27362)" (flutter#27364)"

This reverts commit 57720b2.

* analysis issues

* no sound null safety because frontend_server is not
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants