Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@AlBlanc
Copy link

@AlBlanc AlBlanc commented Apr 22, 2021

iOS universal links were not handled by the engine. With this PR, the FlutterAppDelegate sends the link path to the navigation channel method pushRoute (similarly to Android App/Deep link or iOS Custom scheme link)

Issues fixed: Android AppLinks is working but not iOS Universal Links

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide and the C++, Objective-C, Java style guides.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt. See testing the engine for instructions on
    writing and running engine tests.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I signed the CLA.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The reviewer has submitted any presubmit flakes in this PR using the engine presubmit flakes form before re-triggering the failure.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat.

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

@AlBlanc AlBlanc force-pushed the ios-universal-link branch from 17c1773 to 96c58ac Compare April 22, 2021 14:58
@blasten blasten requested review from gaaclarke and jmagman April 23, 2021 19:23
@AlBlanc
Copy link
Author

AlBlanc commented Apr 28, 2021

@gaaclarke, @jmagman is everything fine in this PR?

Copy link
Member

@jmagman jmagman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gaaclarke may have more comments, he has more familiarly with this behavior #22356

} else if (userActivity.activityType == NSUserActivityTypeBrowsingWeb) {
return NO;
} else {
NSURLComponents* components = [NSURLComponents componentsWithURL:userActivity.webpageURL
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you get the query and path off the userActivity.webpageURL URL if it's nonnull instead of creating a NSURLComponents?

continueUserActivity:userActivity
restorationHandler:^(NSArray<id<UIUserActivityRestoring>>* __nullable restorableObjects){
}];
XCTAssertTrue(result);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe I'm missing something but shouldn't this be false since it falls into the else if (userActivity.activityType == NSUserActivityTypeBrowsingWeb) statement?

OCMVerify([navigationChannel invokeMethod:@"pushRoute" arguments:@"/custom/route?query=test"]);
}

- (void)skip_testLaunchUniversalLink {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the unit test 😄

@chinmaygarde
Copy link
Member

@AlBlanc Any updates on @jmagman s comments?

@chinmaygarde
Copy link
Member

Closing this as stale for now. Please re-open once progress can be made. Thanks.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants