Skip to content

Conversation

tejasd
Copy link
Contributor

@tejasd tejasd commented Nov 11, 2020

#no-changelog

b/172929809

@google-oss-bot
Copy link

1 Warning
⚠️ Did you forget to add a changelog entry? (Add #no-changelog to the PR description to silence this warning.)

Generated by 🚫 Danger

Copy link
Member

@paulb777 paulb777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this impact 3P? Do we need a patch for 7.1.0?

@tejasd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tejasd commented Nov 11, 2020

It is very likely affecting 3P as well - but I haven't tested it. If you don't mind, I'll merge it in right now and copybara it (so that it unblocks the 1P customer) - and I will confirm the 3P situation so that we can release patch.

@tejasd tejasd merged commit 1adc4a1 into master Nov 11, 2020
@samedson
Copy link
Contributor

@paulb777 so far I'm not seeing this affect 3Ps

tejasd added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
…sue with the version associated with the crash upload (#6955)"

This reverts commit 1adc4a1.
@tejasd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tejasd commented Nov 11, 2020

@paulb777 A patch shouldn't be needed - there's a backend change that'll fix it + revert of this revert + fixes - #6958

tejasd added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
… + unit test. (#6958)

* Revert "Revert changes in Crashlytics version - as it's causing an issue with the version associated with the crash upload (#6955)"

This reverts commit 1adc4a1.

* Fix the issue that was causing the problem

* Add unit test to make sure this is caught in case of changes.
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 12, 2020
@paulb777 paulb777 deleted the td/revert-crashlytics-version-2 branch January 28, 2021 04:22
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants