Skip to content

[compiler][bugfix] Returned functions are not always frozen #33047

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mofeiZ
Copy link
Contributor

@mofeiZ mofeiZ commented Apr 28, 2025

Fixes an edge case in React Compiler's effects inference model.

Returned values should only be typed as 'frozen' if they are (1) local and (2) not a function expression which may capture and mutate this function's outer context. See test fixtures for details

Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.

Fixes an edge case in React Compiler's effects inference model.

Returned values should only be typed as 'frozen' if they are (1) local and (2) not a function expression which may capture and mutate this function's outer context. See test fixtures for details
Copy link
Member

@josephsavona josephsavona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice

@mofeiZ mofeiZ merged commit 12f4cb8 into main Apr 30, 2025
26 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
Fixes an edge case in React Compiler's effects inference model.

Returned values should only be typed as 'frozen' if they are (1) local
and (2) not a function expression which may capture and mutate this
function's outer context. See test fixtures for details
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33047).
* #32765
* #32747
* __->__ #33047

DiffTrain build for [12f4cb8](12f4cb8)
mofeiZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…ants, after fixes, tmp

```js
function Component() {
  useEffect(() => {
    let hasCleanedUp = false;
    document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
    // effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
    return () => {
      hasCleanedUp = true;
    }
  };
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.

```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x = 4;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

### Solution

Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let' | 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and `let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.

Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext` and `StoreContext` declarations

~(note: also see alternative implementation in #32745

#### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01% of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094). The [other changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575) were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from #33047. I tried to represent most interesting changes in new test fixtures
mofeiZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…ants

```js
function Component() {
  useEffect(() => {
    let hasCleanedUp = false;
    document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
    // effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
    return () => {
      hasCleanedUp = true;
    }
  };
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.

```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x = 4;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

### Solution

Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let' | 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and `let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.

Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext` and `StoreContext` declarations

~(note: also see alternative implementation in #32745

### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01% of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094). The [other changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575) were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from #33047. I tried to represent most interesting changes in new test fixtures

`
mofeiZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…ants

```js
function Component() {
  useEffect(() => {
    let hasCleanedUp = false;
    document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
    // effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
    return () => {
      hasCleanedUp = true;
    }
  };
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.

```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x = 4;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

### Solution

Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let' | 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and `let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.

Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext` and `StoreContext` declarations

~(note: also see alternative implementation in #32745

### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01% of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094). The [other changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575) were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from #33047. I tried to represent most interesting changes in new test fixtures

`
mofeiZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…ants (#32747)

```js
function Component() {
  useEffect(() => {
    let hasCleanedUp = false;
    document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
    // effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
    return () => {
      hasCleanedUp = true;
    }
  };
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and
rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For
example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a
synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.

```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x = 4;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're
rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

### Solution

Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext
followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let'
| 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and
`let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.

Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext`
and `StoreContext` declarations

~(note: also see alternative implementation in
#32745

### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large
meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01%
of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct
bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094).
The [other
changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575)
were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from
#33047. I tried to represent most
interesting changes in new test fixtures

`
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…ants (#32747)

```js
function Component() {
  useEffect(() => {
    let hasCleanedUp = false;
    document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
    // effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
    return () => {
      hasCleanedUp = true;
    }
  };
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and
rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For
example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a
synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.

```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x = 4;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're
rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted

let x;
x = 5;

// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```

### Solution

Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext
followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let'
| 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and
`let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.

Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext`
and `StoreContext` declarations

~(note: also see alternative implementation in
#32745

### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large
meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01%
of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct
bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094).
The [other
changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575)
were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from
#33047. I tried to represent most
interesting changes in new test fixtures

`

DiffTrain build for [9d795d3](9d795d3)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants