-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49.4k
[compiler] Fix for consecutive DCE'd branches with phis #31959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
josephsavona
wants to merge
1
commit into
facebook:main
from
josephsavona:merge-consecutive-blocks-rewrites-phis
Closed
[compiler] Fix for consecutive DCE'd branches with phis #31959
josephsavona
wants to merge
1
commit into
facebook:main
from
josephsavona:merge-consecutive-blocks-rewrites-phis
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in facebook#31940. When we merge consecutive blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the blocks on each merge as in facebook#31940, we can do a single iteration over all the phis at the end to fix them up.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
josephsavona
commented
Jan 2, 2025
Comment on lines
+1
to
+20
function Component() { | ||
let v3, v4, acc; | ||
v3 = false; | ||
v4 = v3; | ||
acc = v3; | ||
if (acc) { | ||
acc = true; | ||
v3 = acc; | ||
} | ||
if (acc) { | ||
v3 = v4; | ||
} | ||
v4 = v3; | ||
return [acc, v3, v4]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export const FIXTURE_ENTRYPOINT = { | ||
fn: Component, | ||
params: [], | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a great repro case, thank you @asmjmp0!
Closes #31940 |
Any progress on this pr? |
Oops, lost track of this one. I’ll take a look next week. |
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2025
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in #31940. When we merge consecutive blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the blocks on each merge as in #31940, we can do a single iteration over all the phis at the end to fix them up. Note: this is a redo of #31959
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2025
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in #31940. When we merge consecutive blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the blocks on each merge as in #31940, we can do a single iteration over all the phis at the end to fix them up. Note: this is a redo of #31959 --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33725). * #33726 * __->__ #33725
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in #31940. When we merge consecutive blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the blocks on each merge as in #31940, we can do a single iteration over all the phis at the end to fix them up.