core/state: fix read-meters + simplify code #24304
Merged
+19
−35
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2022
JacekGlen
pushed a commit
to JacekGlen/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2022
maoueh
pushed a commit
to streamingfast/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2022
19 tasks
gzliudan
added a commit
to gzliudan/XDPoSChain
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2025
gzliudan
added a commit
to XinFinOrg/XDPoSChain
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that our meters are still not quite 100%.
I think the fault lies on the
s.SnapshotAccountReadshandling. TheSnapshotStorageReads/StorageReadswere seemingly correct, because they did this litlte dance with pointers, to ensure that the final defer-method would update the correct counter, which theSnapshotAccountReads/AccountReadswas missing.When looking into it a bit, I found that it could be simplified. This slightly changes the semantics of the timer -- the timer measurement in this PR covers only the pure lookup from snapshot/trie, not the time for rlp decoding and other paths -- the time for that will wind up on the
executiontimer. I don't think either approach is more correct than the other, but it does simplify the code to do it like this. The alternative would be to add the same complex pointer-dance to the AccountReads handling.