Skip to content

Conversation

VolodymyrBg
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Added a clear description for the admin_sequencerActive JSON-RPC endpoint in the node operators documentation. The description explains that this endpoint returns the current status of the sequencer process and its purpose. This completes the documentation for the admin namespace endpoints.

@VolodymyrBg VolodymyrBg requested a review from a team as a code owner March 25, 2025 19:20
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 19be061
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67e5c86140bd6c0008ace414
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1535--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the JSON-RPC API documentation for the admin_sequencerActive endpoint. The placeholder text "TODO: add description" has been replaced with a description that specifies the endpoint returns whether the sequencer is currently active. The updated text clarifies that the endpoint can be used to check the current state of the sequencer process. No modifications have been made to the underlying logic or control flow.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: fix typo #1162: The changes in the main PR regarding the admin_sequencerActive endpoint's documentation are directly related to the modifications made in the retrieved PR, which also includes the admin_sequencerActive method, albeit with a focus on other methods and a typo fix.
  • Update json-rpc.mdx #915: The changes in the main PR and the retrieved PR both pertain to the admin_sequencerActive endpoint in the JSON-RPC API documentation, with the main PR updating the endpoint's description and the retrieved PR modifying the parameters for the same endpoint.

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d0370f and 19be061.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx (1)

1-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Metadata: Missing required frontmatter fields.
The frontmatter currently includes only title, lang, and description. For a regular page, the guidelines require that fields such as topic, personas, categories, and content_type are also present and non-empty.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx (2)

987-992: Sample success output placeholder remains.
Please replace the "todo: add Sample success output" placeholder with a concrete example of a successful JSON response to aid users in understanding the endpoint’s output format.


889-892: Admin namespace description is still pending.
A "todo" comment remains for adding the admin namespace description. Consider including a brief description of the admin namespace to provide context for all contained endpoints.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~890-~890: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “to-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...: 1, "result": null } ``` ### admin todo: add admin namespace description #### ...

(TO_DO_HYPHEN)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2406760 and 5d0370f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria: - First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file: 1. For regular pages, ensure AL...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
    1. For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    personas: [non-empty array]
    categories: [non-empty array]
    content_type: [valid type]
    ---
    1. For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    ---
    1. If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
      'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:
    pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"
    Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'
  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: pr-workflow
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/operators/node-operators/json-rpc.mdx (1)

968-972: Enhanced description for admin_sequencerActive confirmed.
The updated description—"Returns whether the sequencer is currently active. This endpoint can be used to check the current state of the sequencer process."—is clear and informative.

@krofax krofax merged commit a4017f4 into ethereum-optimism:main Mar 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants