-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 264
Rewrite of the Issuing new assets with SuperchainERC20 page #1376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewrite of the Issuing new assets with SuperchainERC20 page #1376
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@qbzzt has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes update the metadata and content for the SuperchainERC20 deployment tutorial. In the JSON metadata file ( Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (6)
10-13
: Improve clarity in the callout block.
The introductory message is clear; however, consider hyphenating “crosschain messaging” to “cross‐chain messaging” for improved readability and consistency.
17-26
: Enhance clarity in the overview section.
The overview effectively explains the deployment process and links to the relevant contracts. As a minor improvement, remove any extra whitespace in the [SuperchainTokenBridge
] link and change “across all network” (line 25) to “across all networks” for grammatical accuracy.
30-31
: Adopt an imperative tone.
Replace “Here we will use the [SuperchainERC20 Starter Kit]” with “Use the [SuperchainERC20 Starter Kit]” to avoid personal pronouns and to align with an imperative documentation style.
88-90
: Fix a typographical error.
Change “settions” to “settings” in the instruction for editingpackages/contracts/configs/deploy-config.toml
to enhance clarity.
128-130
: Validate the use of sample keys.
Ensure that theDEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY
provided is clearly marked as a placeholder used for demonstration. If these values are published for documentation purposes, add a note or comment indicating that they are not production credentials.
144-152
: Ensure placeholder values are clearly indicated.
The sample token address and private key in this section should be marked as dummy values. This will prevent accidental exposure or misuse of sensitive information and address the static analysis warning regarding a “Generic API Key.”🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
147-147: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/_meta.json
(1 hunks)pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pages/stack/interop/tutorials/_meta.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
147-147: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (4)
32-35
: "What you'll do" section is clear.
The bullet point succinctly outlines the planned action.
36-39
: "What you'll learn" section stands out.
The learning objectives are clearly listed and easy to follow.
157-171
: Deployment command instructions are clear.
The commands for minting tokens and checking balances are well documented and provide practical guidance to users.
176-184
: "Next steps" section is well structured.
The bullet points are concise, follow the imperative form, and align with the documentation style guidelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (3)
17-22
: Reorganized introduction and overview
The new "Overview" header along with the introductory paragraphs successfully reframe the tutorial’s purpose. Note that the markdown link for the SuperchainTokenBridge has an extra trailing space (e.g.,); consider removing that space to ensure consistent formatting.
SuperchainTokenBridge
23-26
: Clarify fixed supply phrasing
The explanation that bridging assets never affects the total supply is clear. However, the phrase “across all network always remains the same” should be revised to “across all networks always remains the same” for grammatical correctness.
111-124
: Sample deploy-config.toml clarity
The sample configuration file is useful; however, the phrase “is the source of our word salary” could be confusing. Consider revising it to a clearer placeholder or explanation to prevent misinterpretation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
147-147: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (17)
11-12
: Clear callout message
The content inside the<Callout>
component clearly communicates that although the SuperchainERC20 standard is ready for production, the OP Stack interoperability upgrade—which is required for crosschain messaging—is still under development.
27-31
: Ensuring fungibility with deterministic deployment
The section clearly explains that SuperchainERC20 assets must share the same contract address across chains and highlights that deterministic deployment methods are used to achieve this.
32-35
: Actionable "What you'll do" section
The bullet point under "What you'll do" succinctly informs the reader that the SuperchainERC20 Starter Kit will be used for deployment on the devnet.
36-39
: Clear "What you'll learn" objectives
The learning objectives are concisely stated, providing readers with a clear expectation of the tutorial’s outcomes.
40-48
: Well-structured prerequisites
The "Prerequisites" section, covering technical knowledge and environment requirements, is clearly organized and comprehensive.
49-59
: Informative development environment and tools section
Descriptions of the development environment and required tools are clear and informative.
63-66
: Step: Install prerequisites
The step instructing users to install the prerequisites and the SuperchainERC20 Starter Kit is clear and actionable.
67-71
: Step: Prepare for deployment
The instructions on preparing for deployment—highlighting the existing deployment to Supersim and the redirection to the Interop devnet—are well stated.
72-80
: Editing RPC endpoints in foundry.toml
The instructions and code snippet for adding RPC endpoints topackages/contracts/foundry.toml
are clear and precise. Consider verifying the endpoint URLs to ensure they remain current.
82-87
: RPC endpoints import command clarity
The command snippet (pnpm contracts:update:rpcs
) and its accompanying note are accurate and helpful.
88-98
: Deploy-config.toml deployment settings
The guidance for editingpackages/contracts/configs/deploy-config.toml
, including the configuration tables for both the[deploy-config]
and[token]
sections, is clear and well formatted.
99-110
: Token configuration instructions
The detailed table outlining the parameters for the[token]
section is comprehensive and clear.
132-139
: Deployment script command
The instruction to run the deployment script viapnpm contracts:deploy:token
is straightforward and clear.
144-149
: Sample token address and static analysis note
The sample TOKEN_ADDRESS provided (0x322f4aF25D370BE2A2C74eEFf0DD0d2AF2e7eD75) is clear; however, if static analysis tools flag it as a generic API key, ensure that it is recognized as a dummy value meant solely for documentation purposes.🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
147-147: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
156-165
: Minting tokens commands clarity
The shell commands for minting tokens on both chains are clearly explained. It might be beneficial to explicitly confirm that the proper RPC endpoints are used for each network during execution.
167-173
: Checking token balance commands
The provided commands for checking the token balance across blockchains are concise and easy to follow.
179-184
: Next steps section
The "Next steps" section effectively outlines further actions and resources for the user. Verify that all link targets and button texts are current and adhere to the project's capitalization and formatting guidelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (3)
23-26
: Improve grammatical accuracy in the bridging explanation.
The explanation is informative; however, update the phrase “the token's total amount across all network always remains the same” to “the token's total amount across all networks always remains the same” to ensure grammatical clarity.
27-30
: Enhance clarity on deterministic deployment methods.
This section effectively explains the need for identical contract addresses across chains. To further aid users unfamiliar with the concept, consider adding a brief explanation or a link to documentation about deterministic deployment methods.
88-90
: Typographical correction needed in deployment instructions.
The instruction "Editpackages/contracts/configs/deploy-config.toml
for the deployment settions" contains a typo. Change "settions" to "settings" to avoid confusion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
(1 hunks)words.txt
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- words.txt
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx
146-146: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (17)
pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (17)
11-12
: Clarify production readiness context in callout message.
The updated callout correctly distinguishes that the SuperchainERC20 standard is production-ready while noting that the OP Stack interoperability upgrade is still under active development. The terminology and emphasis are appropriate.
17-17
: Review header consistency between page title and section header.
The file presents an h1 titled "Issuing new assets with SuperchainERC20" and then introduces an "Overview" section. Consider harmonizing these by either updating the main title to "Overview" or adjusting the hierarchy so the reader is not confused by mixed headers.
19-21
: Ensure clear introduction with up-to-date links.
The overview paragraph concisely explains the guide’s purpose and includes useful links to the SuperchainERC20 and SuperchainTokenBridge contracts as well as the explainer. Verify that the linked URLs remain valid and point to the intended resources.
32-35
: "What you'll do" section is concise and actionable.
The bullet point clearly instructs users to deploy a SuperchainERC20 token on the devnet using the Starter Kit. The content is straightforward and meets the user's objectives.
36-39
: "What you'll learn" section is well defined.
The brief summary of learning outcomes regarding cross-chain token deployment is clear and informative.
42-59
: Prerequisites section is clear and well structured.
The sections on technical knowledge, development environment, and required tools (including Foundry) provide the necessary context for users. Consider verifying that the listed tools are current with the latest development recommendations.
63-66
: Installation instructions are clear.
The guidance to follow the setup steps in the SuperchainERC20 Starter Kit is concise and properly directs the user to the necessary resources.
67-70
: Deployment preparation steps are adequately detailed.
The instructions clearly explain that while the Starter Kit deploys a token to Supersim, this guide will cover deployment to the Interop devnet.
72-80
: RPC endpoints configuration is well documented.
The example provided in thefoundry.toml
file is informative. Verify that the endpoint URLs (e.g., forinterop-alpha-0.optimism.io
) remain accurate and accessible.
82-87
: Import command explanation is succinct.
The note and command (pnpm contracts:update:rpcs
) clearly inform users that while most endpoints are imported automatically, the Interop devnet must be added manually.
92-107
: Deployment configuration tables are detailed and helpful.
The markdown tables for the[deploy-config]
and[token]
sections provide clear guidance on the necessary parameters. Ensure that the formatting renders correctly across different markdown viewers.
108-110
: Parameter explanations are comprehensive.
The additional note about ensuring the owner address has ETH on the devnets adds valuable context for users.
111-123
: Sample deployment configuration is clear and well-structured.
The provided TOML snippet demonstrates the configuration layout effectively.
132-139
: Deployment script execution is clear.
The instruction to run the deployment script viapnpm contracts:deploy:token
is concise and straightforward.
155-164
: Mint tokens step is clear and well specified.
The instructions for minting tokens on both chains using the owner address are detailed and unambiguous.
165-171
: Balance check instructions are precise.
The commands to verify the token balance on both devnets are correctly outlined.
175-181
: Next steps section is informative and actionable.
The list of next steps and resource links provides clear direction for users seeking further guidance. Ensure that all link texts and URLs remain current.
Note: Needs to be merged after ethereum-optimism#1376
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good, just a few comments that need to be resolved, but you're good to merge after those are done
Description
A rewrite of the page.
Tests
N/A
Additional context
N/A
Metadata
N/A