docs: enhance CONTRIBUTING.md with comprehensive technical details and improved structure

[crStiv]

• Restore technical details about Nextra framework
• Add build troubleshooting guide
• Improve content guidelines section
• Maintain clear structure and navigation
• Keep all critical information
• Enhance readability with better formatting

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ab7671a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67c89209fb9fcd0008626137
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1331--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@bradleycamacho has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7ee5c4 and ab7671a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
• pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx (6 hunks)
• words.txt (1 hunks)

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request restructures the CONTRIBUTING.md file for Optimism Docs by introducing a comprehensive Table of Contents and clearly defined sections. The document now includes parts such as Overview, Getting Started, Contributing Process, Pull Request Process, Code of Conduct, and Additional Ways to Contribute. The reorganization condenses and reformats the previous content, adding detailed instructions on prerequisites, development setup, file architecture, local testing, and pull request submission. The process for submitting pull requests has been reworked into a structured multi-step guide, emphasizing the importance of passing local tests and resolving issues prior to submission. Additionally, warnings and notes have been reformulated for improved visibility, and a Code of Conduct section has been added to outline expected contributor behavior.

Suggested reviewers

• sbvegan

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

CONTRIBUTING.md (2)

97-99: Review Blockquote Formatting
The blockquoted notes (for “Note”, “Important”, and “Tip”) are clear and useful. Static analysis hints indicate potential blank lines within these blockquote sections (MD028). Please confirm that no unintended blank lines are present inside these blockquotes to comply with markdownlint guidelines.

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

98-98: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

---

125-125: Punctuation Consistency at Conclusion
The final thank-you line ("Thank you for contributing to Optimism Docs! 🎉") might benefit from a slight punctuation adjustment to ensure a smooth transition from the preceding list. For example, if the list item “- 🗣️ Spreading the word in your community” is intended to flow into the closing sentence, consider adding a comma or ensuring a clear paragraph break for improved readability.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~125-~125: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ommunity Thank you for contributing to Optimism Docs! 🎉

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3a4a81 and 16eb469.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

CONTRIBUTING.md

[uncategorized] ~125-~125: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ommunity Thank you for contributing to Optimism Docs! 🎉

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

CONTRIBUTING.md

98-98: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

---

100-100: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

5-19: Well-Structured Table of Contents
The new Table of Contents provides a clear and comprehensive roadmap for navigating the document. Please verify that each anchor link (e.g. “#overview”, “#getting-started”, etc.) exactly matches the corresponding section headers in the file to ensure smooth in-page navigation.

[crStiv]

@bradleycamacho hi. sorry for bothering you, but I'm just curious what's going on here :)

[bradleycamacho]

@crStiv sorry we've had some issues with our checks. Thanks for the edits!