Skip to content

Conversation

jvmi7
Copy link
Contributor

@jvmi7 jvmi7 commented Feb 5, 2025

No description provided.

@jvmi7 jvmi7 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2025 00:53
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6720ec9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67a2bcb31e728000082c8e24
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1319--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the package.json file by modifying the scripts. Specifically, the lint script has been revised to remove the execution of the linkcheck command from its process. Additionally, the dedicated linkcheck script, which previously executed the command using the Lychee tool for checking links, has been entirely removed. This update alters the flow of the linting process, ensuring that link checking is no longer performed during lint execution. The remaining lint script now sequentially executes several commands, including ESLint, spellcheck lint, breadcrumb checking, and redirect checking. Furthermore, the .node-version, .npmrc, and .nvmrc files have been updated to specify the Node.js version 20.11.0, while the .npmrc file has also been updated to specify the pnpm version 10.2.0. The netlify.toml file has been modified to include environment variables for both Node.js and pnpm versions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant L as Lint Script
    participant E as ESLint
    participant S as Spellcheck Lint
    participant B as Check Breadcrumbs
    participant R as Check Redirects

    Dev->>L: Run "pnpm lint"
    L->>E: Execute "eslint . --ext mdx --max-warnings 0"
    E-->>L: Return ESLint results
    L->>S: Execute "pnpm spellcheck:lint"
    S-->>L: Return spellcheck results
    L->>B: Execute "pnpm check-breadcrumbs"
    B-->>L: Return breadcrumbs results
    L->>R: Execute "pnpm check-redirects"
    R-->>L: Return redirects results
    L-->>Dev: Return combined lint outcome
Loading

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6748444 and 6720ec9.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .node-version (1 hunks)
  • .npmrc (1 hunks)
  • .nvmrc (1 hunks)
  • netlify.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .node-version
  • .nvmrc
  • netlify.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.npmrc (2)

2-2: Node.js Version Configuration
The addition of use-node-version=20.11.0 explicitly defines the Node.js version for this environment. This change is consistent with the updates found in other configuration files (e.g., .node-version, .nvmrc, and netlify.toml), ensuring a uniform runtime environment across the project.


3-3: pnpm Version Configuration
The new configuration use-pnpm-version=10.2.0 clearly specifies the pnpm version to be used. This change helps maintain consistency in dependency management and aligns with the updates in your CI/build configurations.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

5-7: Streamline Lint Script by Removing Linkcheck
The updated lint script now omits the chained pnpm linkcheck command, which aligns with the new linting process. Ensure that if any link validation is required, it is executed as part of a separate workflow or tool.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f1c5c1 and 6748444.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: pr-workflow
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

5-13: Clean-up: Removal of the Linkcheck Script
The dedicated "linkcheck": "lychee --config ./lychee.toml --quiet \"./pages\"" entry has been completely removed. This simplifies the scripts section. Confirm that this removal does not inadvertently disable any important link validation steps previously expected in your continuous integration or build process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants