Notice for the breaking changes for Ethereum's Pectra activation #1270
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sbvegan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request involves two primary changes: a documentation link update in the Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant DO as Documentation Updater
participant TS as next-env.d.ts
participant MD as pectra-changes.mdx
DO->>TS: Update documentation link
DO->>MD: Create new documentation file
MD-->>DO: Document Pectra upgrade details
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (4)
14-19: Add year to date specifications for clarity.The activation dates should include the year for completeness and to avoid ambiguity:
- "Wed Feb 12" → "Wed Feb 12, 2025"
- "Wed Feb 19" → "Wed Feb 19, 2025"
44-44: Fix grammatical errors.The sentence contains two grammatical issues:
-For the first part, we will be releasing a new versions of the OP Stack that includes the necessary changes to make sure OP Stack chains do not break when the L1 pectra upgrade activates. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, you will need to follow additional steps outlined below. +For the first part, we will be releasing new versions of the OP Stack that include the necessary changes to make sure OP Stack chains do not break when the L1 pectra upgrade activates. If you are running a fault proof enabled chain, you will need to follow additional steps outlined below.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~44-~44: The plural noun “versions” cannot be used with the article “a”. Did you mean “a new version” or “new versions”?
Context: ...or the first part, we will be releasing a new versions of the OP Stack that includes the neces...(A_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~44-~44: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ...ade to these latest versions. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
57-64: Consider consolidating duplicate configuration verification steps.The configuration verification steps are identical for both chain operators and node operators. Consider creating a shared section to avoid duplication.
Also applies to: 108-115
89-89: Add missing comma for clarity.-Finally you will need to update your `op-challenger` to the new release version that will be provided soon. +Finally, you will need to update your `op-challenger` to the new release version that will be provided soon.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~89-~89: Consider adding a comma after ‘Finally’ for more clarity.
Context: ...e. ### Update your op-challenger Finally you will need to update your `op-challe...(RB_LY_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
next-env.d.ts(1 hunks)pages/builders/notices/_meta.json(1 hunks)pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- next-env.d.ts
- pages/builders/notices/_meta.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx
[style] ~23-~23: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ...'s included in Pectra? Pectra contains a variety of EIPs, some of which apply to the OP Sta...
(A_VARIETY_OF)
[grammar] ~44-~44: The plural noun “versions” cannot be used with the article “a”. Did you mean “a new version” or “new versions”?
Context: ...or the first part, we will be releasing a new versions of the OP Stack that includes the neces...
(A_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~44-~44: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ...ade to these latest versions. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...
(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
[style] ~46-~46: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information on this part of the upgrade as when the...
(MORE_INFO)
[typographical] ~89-~89: Consider adding a comma after ‘Finally’ for more clarity.
Context: ...e. ### Update your op-challenger Finally you will need to update your `op-challe...
(RB_LY_COMMA)
[style] ~94-~94: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...a upgrade. The commits from the PR will need to be applied to your chain before Pectra ...
(REP_NEED_TO_VB)
[style] ~98-~98: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...For node operators Node operators will need to upgrade to the respective releases befo...
(REP_NEED_TO_VB)
[duplication] ~105-~105: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... to the latest release * op-node at vTBD * op-geth at vTBD ### Verify Your Configuration...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Frontmatter and imports are properly structured.The frontmatter contains all necessary metadata, and the component imports are correctly specified.
9-13: LGTM! Title and introduction are well-structured.The heading follows sentence case guidelines, and the introduction clearly states the purpose while maintaining appropriate tone.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
This notice page will inform chain and node operators how to prepare for Pectra's breaking changes. Things are still developing on the L1 and L2 side, so this will need updates. We may want to ship a MVP version and update the docs as we go, but I'm just putting this here for now.
Additional context