Skip to content

Conversation

krofax
Copy link
Collaborator

@krofax krofax commented Nov 8, 2024

Description

Added extra spacing between paragraphs.

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

@krofax krofax requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2024 13:22
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f4a6ba0
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/672e2efb3b1cfb00088d4dea
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1093--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made to the "Transaction finality" document focus on enhancing clarity and correcting misconceptions about transaction finality on OP Stack chains. Key updates include a detailed explanation of the finality process, clarification of transaction states, and corrections regarding the timeframe for finalization. The document now accurately addresses common misconceptions, particularly the misunderstanding about the 7-day finalization period, and explains the roles of various components in the finality process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx Revised introduction for clarity, detailed steps to finality, clarified terminology, corrected misconceptions about finalization timeframes, and explained the roles of the Standard Bridge and Fault Proof challenges.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

  • Transaction Finality Explainer #987: This PR introduces a guide on transaction finality within OP Stack chains, directly relating to the enhancements made in this PR regarding clarity and misconceptions.

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan
  • zainbacchus

Warning

Tool Failures:

Tool Failure Count:


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 721b0dc and f4a6ba0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx (2)

57-60: Remove bold emphasis for consistency with guidelines.

The text "This is incorrect." uses bold for emphasis, which should be avoided according to the documentation guidelines. Consider rephrasing to emphasize the point without formatting:

-**This is incorrect.** Transactions on OP Stack chains become finalized
+This is incorrect. Transactions on OP Stack chains become finalized

Line range hint 62-98: Standardize emphasis formatting throughout misconceptions section.

Several instances of bold text are used for emphasis throughout this section. According to the guidelines, we should avoid using bold, italics, or all caps for emphasis. Consider revising the following instances:

  1. "Fault Proof challenges"
  2. "This is incorrect."
  3. "withdrawal claim"
  4. "unsafe", "safe", and "finalized"

Consider using clear sentence structure and word choice to convey emphasis instead of formatting.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea8b8e9 and e8e1252.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/transactions/transaction-finality.mdx (2)

Line range hint 1-7: Headers and frontmatter follow guidelines correctly.

The document structure maintains proper sentence case in headers while correctly preserving technical terms like "OP Stack".


Line range hint 9-54: Technical content is accurate and well-structured.

The explanation of finality states and the sequence diagram effectively communicate the technical concepts while maintaining proper capitalization of technical terms like "Ethereum", "Rollups", and "Sequencer".

@smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

I'd use css for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants