-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
[ML] Store feature importance baselines in model metadata #1522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
\ping @benwtrent |
this adds the new field `feature_importance_baseline` and allows it to be optionally be included in the model's metadata. Related to: elastic/ml-cpp#1522
…ic#63172) this adds the new field `feature_importance_baseline` and allows it to be optionally be included in the model's metadata. Related to: elastic/ml-cpp#1522
|
Java related PR: elastic/elasticsearch#63172 Verified formatting all works :) |
tveasey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks good. I still feel we could unify binary and multiclass code paths by pushing some logic into CTreeShapFeatureImportance, but we can explore that in a separate change. I made a couple of purely cosmetic suggestions, which I'll address since I'm taking over getting this merged, but this is basically LGTM.
… (#63237) this adds the new field `feature_importance_baseline` and allows it to be optionally be included in the model's metadata. Related to: elastic/ml-cpp#1522
With this PR we will be able to store the feature importance baselines explicitly in the model_metadata. Being able baseline to retrieve the baselines will significantly simplify UI code related to the feature importance visualization.
|
Thank you for getting this PR merged @tveasey 🙏 |
With this PR we will be able to store the feature importance baselines explicitly in the
model_metadata. Being able baseline to retrieve the baselines will significantly simplify UI code related to the feature importance visualization.Classification
Regression
This is not a user-facing change, hence I mark it as a
non-issue.