-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Fix handling indexed envelopes crossing the dateline in mvt API #91105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1af5de1
Fix handling indexed envelopes crossing the dateline in mvt API
iverase 56b8d94
Update docs/changelog/91105.yaml
iverase c2b7d95
make extent random in test
iverase c1938d2
Merge branch 'mvtEnvelope' of github.com:iverase/elasticsearch into m…
iverase 9ac16ef
Merge branch 'main' into mvtEnvelope
iverase File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| pr: 91105 | ||
| summary: Fix handling indexed envelopes crossing the dateline in mvt API | ||
| area: Geo | ||
| type: bug | ||
| issues: | ||
| - 91060 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious why the polygon test has a single polygon split to a multipolygon by the function:
But the BBOX is not split by the same function in the envelope test?
Perhaps this is not part of this PR, since this PR focuses on MVT, and the MVT call:
Does seem to split both the polygon and the envelope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about the same. The didn't like the options I had to return a split geometry. Either return a multipolygon which didn't feel right for an input envelope, or a geometry collection containing two envelopes which I did not like it either.
Therefore I decided to return it unchanged. We can visit it later if it dies not feel right.